Article View: sci.physics
Article #16029Re: A second "big bang"
From: Chosp
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 19:54
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 19:54
30 lines
2675 bytes
2675 bytes
"Indestructible Truth Holder" <nospam@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:b23mos$rol$1@slb9.atl.mindspring.net... > "Chosp" <chosp@cox.net> wrote in message > news:AUY0a.7373$LW1.344670@news1.west.cox.net... > > > > "Indestructible Truth Holder" <nospam@mindspring.com> wrote in message > > news:b20u0b$pe8$1@slb9.atl.mindspring.net... > > > "Mark Folsom" <folsomman@prodigy.com> wrote in message > > > news:v47nmfjb1fhke9@corp.supernews.com... > > > > > > > > and the way scientists insist on "cooking the books" to prop it up > if > > > > > observations don't quite fit... > > > > > > > > Maybe you can offer some specific examples instead of just > bullshit...? > > > > > > The fudge factors. > > > > How's that is getting specific? > > Indestructible Truth Holder just burned > > up re-entering the atmosphere. > > End of story. > > That was in poor taste. Perhaps. But, how about getting specific? You are still not answering the question.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Jfd1a.10945$LW1.588686@news1.west.cox.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!nntp-relay.ihug.net!ihug.co.nz!west.cox.net!cox.net!p01!news1.west.cox.net.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mailReferences:
<b1njmo$bsd$1@slb3.atl.mindspring.net> <3E3F6FB9.6020303@hotmail.NOSPAM.com> <xaK%9.26458$ZE1.557225@news1.nokia.com> <3E3F79EB.8F5B1796@nic.or.kr> <JJQ0a.42784$jM5.108252@newsfeeds.bigpond.com> <v47nmfjb1fhke9@corp.supernews.com> <b20u0b$pe8$1@slb9.atl.mindspring.net> <AUY0a.7373$LW1.344670@news1.west.cox.net> <b23mos$rol$1@slb9.atl.mindspring.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10384c,830f5d0cde7d55f X-Google-Attributes: gid10384c,public X-Google-Thread: f74ae,3df8337c8f392688 X-Google-Attributes: gidf74ae,public X-Google-Thread: 10b271,3df8337c8f392688 X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,public X-Google-Thread: 111645,3df8337c8f392688 X-Google-Attributes: gid111645,public X-Google-Thread: 10f545,3df8337c8f392688 X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-02-08 11:56:53 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!nntp.cs.ubc.ca!nntp-relay.ihug.net!ihug.co.nz!west.cox.net!cox.net!p01!news1.west.cox.net.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: "Chosp" <chosp@cox.net> Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.physics.relativity,fr.sci.astrophysique,alt.alien.visitors References: <b1njmo$bsd$1@slb3.atl.mindspring.net> <3E3F6FB9.6020303@hotmail.NOSPAM.com> <xaK%9.26458$ZE1.557225@news1.nokia.com> <3E3F79EB.8F5B1796@nic.or.kr> <JJQ0a.42784$jM5.108252@newsfeeds.bigpond.com> <v47nmfjb1fhke9@corp.supernews.com> <b20u0b$pe8$1@slb9.atl.mindspring.net> <AUY0a.7373$LW1.344670@news1.west.cox.net> <b23mos$rol$1@slb9.atl.mindspring.net> Subject: Re: A second "big bang" Lines: 33 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Message-ID: <Jfd1a.10945$LW1.588686@news1.west.cox.net> Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 19:54:17 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.7.135.1 X-Complaints-To: abuse@cox.net X-Trace: news1.west.cox.net 1044734057 68.7.135.1 (Sat, 08 Feb 2003 14:54:17 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 14:54:17 EST Organization: Cox Communications