Re: A second "big bang"

Article View: sci.physics

Article #16033

#16033

From: Minor Crank
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 06:09

33 lines
2384 bytes

"Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
news:3E3FEC1F.952CFB44@hate.spam.net...
> The Dark Doctor wrote:
> >
> > I'm looking for information on what specific types of conditions
would be
> > necessary for a second "big bang" to be triggered in the
universe.
>
> Depends on the size you want.  Brookhaven National Laboratory
smashing
> ultra-relativistic gold nuclei will give you little Big Bangs.
Every
> Planck-scale spacetime fluctuation is an ultimately small Big
Bang -
> which may be a full sized one.

BNL can achieve Planck-scale spacetime fluctuations?

> Perhaps physical reality is a
> reciprocal lattice, and the smallest ones are the biggest ones.

You are obviously referring to a theory that I've not heard of. Some
references or links, please?

> OTOH,
> since that gets things really crowded really quickly (Planck
> frequency!), maybe Kuratowski's theorem delimits the conditions
> necessary for a persistent pop.  No tangle, no tango.

How're the papers going?

Minor Crank

Technical Details

Message-ID: <PU10a.180782$AV4.4019@sccrnsc01>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!wn11feed!worldnet.att.net!204.127.198.203!attbi_feed3!attbi.com!sccrnsc01.POSTED!not-for-mail

References: <b1njmo$bsd$1@slb3.atl.mindspring.net> <3E3FEC1F.952CFB44@hate.spam.net>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,3df8337c8f392688
X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,public
X-Google-Thread: 111645,3df8337c8f392688
X-Google-Attributes: gid111645,public
X-Google-Thread: f74ae,3df8337c8f392688
X-Google-Attributes: gidf74ae,public
X-Google-Thread: 10f545,3df8337c8f392688
X-Google-Attributes: gid10f545,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-02-04 22:09:52 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!wn11feed!worldnet.att.net!204.127.198.203!attbi_feed3!attbi.com!sccrnsc01.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Minor Crank" <blue_whaleANTISPAM@attbi.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.physics.relativity,fr.sci.astrophysique
References: <b1njmo$bsd$1@slb3.atl.mindspring.net> <3E3FEC1F.952CFB44@hate.spam.net>
Subject: Re: A second "big bang"
Lines: 35
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Message-ID: <PU10a.180782$AV4.4019@sccrnsc01>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.237.91.10
X-Complaints-To: abuse@attbi.com
X-Trace: sccrnsc01 1044425391 12.237.91.10 (Wed, 05 Feb 2003 06:09:51 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 06:09:51 GMT
Organization: AT&T Broadband
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 06:09:51 GMT

Reply to Parent Message