🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.physics
Article #16046

Re: The electron seen for the first time

#16046
From: Jim Goodman
Date: Wed, 26 May 1999 00:00
186 lines
9769 bytes
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_01BEA7A3.AD6C0D00
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

comment below

Jim Goodman
sawf@bellsouth.net
http://personal.msy.bellsouth.net/~sawf/
Energy and Structure of Molecules



Vertner Vergon <vergon@rglobal.net> wrote in article
<374c3094.3999646@news.rglobal.net>...
> On Wed, 26 May 1999 01:47:05 GMT, "Jim Goodman" <sawf@bellsouth.net>
> wrote:
> 
>
> >comment below.
> >-- 
> >Jim Goodman
> >sawf@bellsouth.net
> >http://personal.msy.bellsouth.net/~sawf/
> >Energy and Structure of Molecules
> >
> >
> >VV: consider two spherical waves for the electron electron
> >interaction going away from each other:
> >
> >r exp(r-vt) and r exp(r+vt) 
> >
> >The positron electron wave functions start on the other
> >side and go to zero at the center of mass when they hit.
> >
> Vergon:
> 
> I'm not sure what your point is.

In general I agree with both models. If your various
electrons have the same mass and different KE,
I like it. Also varying potential energies in pairs.

I read your theory a while back and liked it. I would
like it better if mass = 938Kev n^2 were different particles.
At least that is what I found. To convert a positron to a proton
requires about 400Kev energy added to the structure of the
positron in some fashion. That the positron structure exists,
I suspect. Why experiment does not find the dipole, I cannot 
guess.

Jim Goodman



> 
> 
> 
> 
> >Vertner Vergon <vergon@rglobal.net> wrote in article
> ><374adf7c.3179292@news.rglobal.net>...
> >> On Tue, 25 May 1999 00:54:47 GMT, Robert@ina.net (Robert Sturm) wrote:
> >> 
> >> > Seeing an Electron
> >> >                                 Milo Wolff
> >> >
> >> >                              Technotran Press
> >> >                1124 Third Street, Manhattan Beach, CA 90266
> >> >                         mwolff@beachnet.gen.ca.us
> >> >
> >> >I want to show you a very interesting web animation of an electron.
> >> >But first let me explain something about the structure of the
> >> >electron. Then when you are finished reading, observe the animation
> >> >below. 
> >> >
> >> >What is an electron?  Never in history has anyone been able to even
> >> >imagine the structure of an electron. Until very recently, the
> >> >electron was thought to be a 'point' made of an unknown, undefineable
> >> >substance called 'charge'. Since a point has no
> >> >dimensions, there is no structure and nothing to see. 
> >> >
> >> >The electron is a wave structure. Recently this structure was found
> >> >(see: A Wave Structure for the Electron) to be two concentric
> >> >spherical moving quantum waves.
> >> >One wave moves inward and one wave moves outward.
> >> 
> >> Vergon:
> >> 
> >> You are right about the spherical wave structure of the electron
> >> (all fermions for that matter)but you are in error that there 
> >> are only two waves.
> >> 
> >> The frequncy of the electron is 1.235 x 10^20/sec.
> >> 
> >> That means there are that many waves (matter waves) comprising the
> >> electron.
> >> 
> 
------=_NextPart_000_01BEA7A3.AD6C0D00
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html><head></head><BODY bgcolor=3D"#FFFFFF"><p><font size=3D2 =
color=3D"#000000" face=3D"Arial">comment below<br><br>Jim =
Goodman<br><font color=3D"#0000FF"><u>sawf@bellsouth.net</u><font =
color=3D"#000000"><br><font =
color=3D"#0000FF"><u>http://personal.msy.bellsouth.net/~sawf/</u><font =
color=3D"#000000"><br>Energy and Structure of =
Molecules<br><br><br><br>Vertner Vergon &lt;<font =
color=3D"#0000FF"><u>vergon@rglobal.net</u><font color=3D"#000000">&gt; =
wrote in article &lt;<font =
color=3D"#0000FF"><u>374c3094.3999646@news.rglobal.net</u><font =
color=3D"#000000">&gt;...<br>&gt; On Wed, 26 May 1999 01:47:05 GMT, =
&quot;Jim Goodman&quot; &lt;<font =
color=3D"#0000FF"><u>sawf@bellsouth.net</u><font =
color=3D"#000000">&gt;<br>&gt; wrote:<br>&gt; <br>&gt;<br>&gt; =
&gt;comment below.<br>&gt; &gt;-- <br>&gt; &gt;Jim Goodman<br>&gt; =
&gt;<font color=3D"#0000FF"><u>sawf@bellsouth.net</u><font =
color=3D"#000000"><br>&gt; &gt;<font =
color=3D"#0000FF"><u>http://personal.msy.bellsouth.net/~sawf/</u><font =
color=3D"#000000"><br>&gt; &gt;Energy and Structure of Molecules<br>&gt; =
&gt;<br>&gt; &gt;<br>&gt; &gt;VV: consider two spherical waves for the =
electron electron<br>&gt; &gt;interaction going away from each =
other:<br>&gt; &gt;<br>&gt; &gt;r exp(r-vt) and r exp(r+vt) <br>&gt; =
&gt;<br>&gt; &gt;The positron electron wave functions start on the =
other<br>&gt; &gt;side and go to zero at the center of mass when they =
hit.<br>&gt; &gt;<br>&gt; Vergon:<br>&gt; <br>&gt; I'm not sure what =
your point is.<br><br>In general I agree with both models. If your =
various<br>electrons have the same mass and different KE,<br>I like it. =
Also varying potential energies in pairs.<br><br>I read your theory a =
while back and liked it. I would<br>like it better if mass =3D 938Kev =
n^2 were different particles.<br>At least that is what I found. To =
convert a positron to a proton<br>requires about 400Kev energy added to =
the structure of the<br>positron in some fashion. That the positron =
structure exists,<br>I suspect. Why experiment does not find the dipole, =
I cannot <br>guess.<br><br>Jim Goodman<br><br><br><br>&gt; <br>&gt; =
<br>&gt; <br>&gt; <br>&gt; &gt;Vertner Vergon &lt;<font =
color=3D"#0000FF"><u>vergon@rglobal.net</u><font color=3D"#000000">&gt; =
wrote in article<br>&gt; &gt;&lt;<font =
color=3D"#0000FF"><u>374adf7c.3179292@news.rglobal.net</u><font =
color=3D"#000000">&gt;...<br>&gt; &gt;&gt; On Tue, 25 May 1999 00:54:47 =
GMT, <font color=3D"#0000FF"><u>Robert@ina.net</u><font =
color=3D"#000000"> (Robert Sturm) wrote:<br>&gt; &gt;&gt; <br>&gt; =
&gt;&gt; &gt; Seeing an Electron<br>&gt; &gt;&gt; &gt; =
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&=
nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&n=
bsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Milo Wolff<br>&gt; =
&gt;&gt; &gt;<br>&gt; &gt;&gt; &gt; =
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&=
nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&n=
bsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Technotran Press<br>&gt; &gt;&gt; &gt; =
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&=
nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;1124 Third Street, Manhattan Beach, CA 90266<br>&gt; =
&gt;&gt; &gt; =
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&=
nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<f=
ont color=3D"#0000FF"><u>mwolff@beachnet.gen.ca.us</u><font =
color=3D"#000000"><br>&gt; &gt;&gt; &gt;<br>&gt; &gt;&gt; &gt;I want to =
show you a very interesting web animation of an electron.<br>&gt; =
&gt;&gt; &gt;But first let me explain something about the structure of =
the<br>&gt; &gt;&gt; &gt;electron. Then when you are finished reading, =
observe the animation<br>&gt; &gt;&gt; &gt;below. <br>&gt; &gt;&gt; =
&gt;<br>&gt; &gt;&gt; &gt;What is an electron? &nbsp;Never in history =
has anyone been able to even<br>&gt; &gt;&gt; &gt;imagine the structure =
of an electron. Until very recently, the<br>&gt; &gt;&gt; &gt;electron =
was thought to be a 'point' made of an unknown, undefineable<br>&gt; =
&gt;&gt; &gt;substance called 'charge'. Since a point has no<br>&gt; =
&gt;&gt; &gt;dimensions, there is no structure and nothing to see. =
<br>&gt; &gt;&gt; &gt;<br>&gt; &gt;&gt; &gt;The electron is a wave =
structure. Recently this structure was found<br>&gt; &gt;&gt; &gt;(see: =
A Wave Structure for the Electron) to be two concentric<br>&gt; &gt;&gt; =
&gt;spherical moving quantum waves.<br>&gt; &gt;&gt; &gt;One wave moves =
inward and one wave moves outward.<br>&gt; &gt;&gt; <br>&gt; &gt;&gt; =
Vergon:<br>&gt; &gt;&gt; <br>&gt; &gt;&gt; You are right about the =
spherical wave structure of the electron<br>&gt; &gt;&gt; (all fermions =
for that matter)but you are in error that there <br>&gt; &gt;&gt; are =
only two waves.<br>&gt; &gt;&gt; <br>&gt; &gt;&gt; The frequncy of the =
electron is 1.235 x 10^20/sec.<br>&gt; &gt;&gt; <br>&gt; &gt;&gt; That =
means there are that many waves (matter waves) comprising the<br>&gt; =
&gt;&gt; electron.<br>&gt; &gt;&gt; <br>&gt; </p>
</font></font></font></font></font></font></font></font></font></font></f=
ont></font></font></font></font></font></font></font></font></font></font=
></font></font></body></html>
------=_NextPart_000_01BEA7A3.AD6C0D00--
Technical Details
Message-ID: <01bea7cd$96421500$a2ea4dd8@default.msy.bellsouth.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <3749f4d2.753334@nn-tk004.ocn.ad.jp> <374adf7c.3179292@news.rglobal.net> <01bea718$eaeb5ea0$a2ea4dd8@default.msy.bellsouth.net> <374c3094.3999646@news.rglobal.net>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,1503f8af4f7395fd
X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,public
X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,1503f8af4f7395fd
X-Google-Attributes: gidfa4c1,public
X-Google-Thread: 10857a,1503f8af4f7395fd
X-Google-Attributes: gid10857a,public
From: "Jim Goodman" <sawf@bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: The electron seen for the first time
Date: 1999/05/26
Message-ID: <01bea7cd$96421500$a2ea4dd8@default.msy.bellsouth.net>
X-Deja-AN: 482509981
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <3749f4d2.753334@nn-tk004.ocn.ad.jp> <374adf7c.3179292@news.rglobal.net> <01bea718$eaeb5ea0$a2ea4dd8@default.msy.bellsouth.net> <374c3094.3999646@news.rglobal.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_01BEA7A3.AD6C0D00"
X-Trace: news2.mia 927760823 216.77.234.162 (Wed, 26 May 1999 19:20:23 EDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 May 1999 19:20:23 EDT
Newsgroups: sci.physics,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.astronomie