🚀 go-pugleaf

On Sep 7, 12:59 pm, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Sep 7, 3:04 am, Pentcho Valev <pva...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Sep 7, 2:09 am, Uncle Al <Uncle...@hate.spam.net> wrote in
> > sci.physics:
>
> > > Contemporary physical theory is a whore.
> > > Physics will then
> > > continue adding epicycles to increasingly untenable models of reality.
>
> > Bravo Uncle Al or whatever you are! The other Uncle Al, that is,
> > Divine Uncle Al, predicted this development in 1954:
>
> >http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/pdf/files/975547d7-2d00-433a-b7e3-4a...
> > Albert Einstein (Divine Uncle Al): "I consider it entirely possible
> > that physics cannot be based upon the field concept, that is on
> > continuous structures. Then nothing will remain of my whole castle in
> > the air, including the theory of gravitation, but also nothing of the
> > rest of contemporary physics."
>
> And, Uncle Al or whatever you are, your recent metamorphosis only
> shows that your masters have somehow ignored your precious
> contributions. Your image remains unchanged. You will remain forever
> one of the silliest bellicose zombies in Einstein criminal cult. Let
> me refer you to a person who, while dying, said essentially what you
> say above, but whose words are much more valuable than everything
> Uncle Al, Divine Uncle Al, Oncle Dom, Uncle Ben etc. have ever found
> it suitable to say:
>
> http://www.ekkehard-friebe.de/wallace.htm
> Bryan Wallace: "There is a popular argument that the world's oldest
> profession is sexual prostitution. I think that it is far more likely
> that the oldest profession is scientific prostitution, and that it is
> still alive and well, and thriving in the 20th century. I suspect that
> long before sex had any commercial value, the prehistoric shamans used
> their primitive knowledge to acquire status, wealth, and political
> power, in much the same way as the dominant scientific and religious
> politicians of our time do.....The true scientist must have faith and
> believe in the scientific method of testing theories, and not in the
> theories themselves. I agree with Seeds argument that "A pseudoscience
> is something that pretends to be a science but does not obey the rules
> of good conduct common to all sciences." Because many of the dominant
> theories of our time do not follow the rules of science, they should
> more properly be labeled pseudoscience. The people who tend to believe
> more in theories than in the scientific method of testing theories,
> and who ignore the evidence against the theories they believe in,
> should be considered pseudoscientists and not true scientists. To the
> extent that the professed beliefs are based on the desire for status,
> wealth, or political reasons, these people are scientific
> prostitutes."
>
> Pentcho Valev
> pva...@yahoo.com

Well my concern is that once you start writing programs, to be
"detectors" you have crossed that line into psuedoscience.
It is bad enough, that the way in which the original detectors were
made, proved nothing, but to carry that forward, as a belief system,
and then by proclamation alone, decree that what these chicken
entrails are telling the wise, is that this is how the universe
works???
And then, after a _plethora of evidence proves almost every tenet of
their arguments in all cases false, they merely find some excuse and
carry on still making loud pronouncements of the end result, when the
very basis of their arguments, has long since been falsified.

Case in point, the Nebular Hypothesis.
They are not spiral nebula, they are galaxies.
Ok, so at that point, the very substance from which their theory was
based, has completely disappeared.
Would not any, sane, man or woman, abandon a theory, that now has no
stuff, with which to make planets???

Yet they continued to proclaim not only that but further that they
knew everything about the universe up until a small fraction after its
inception.
And so then even after a gas giant was found in an orbit, closer to a
star, than Mercury is to our sun, still they refused to let go, and
merely formulated some cock-and-bull story that somehow, this gas
giant, had spiraled in, closer to the sun and then stopped.
Forget how impossible this would be, no need to look further or show
in any way how that is possible, any simple explanation no matter how
ludicrous will suffice.
Poppycock!
Tabloid physics!
Chicken entrails, physics by proclamation and decree, and the worst
for of psuedoscience that which comes from authority.
Well I for one refuse to be lured into this spider web of deceit.
I move that high energy physics has become irrelevant!
And those who wish to waste their time attaching leptons and Dolly
Partons to their work to satisfy this lot may do so as they please,
but those who follow blindly their notions and seek for those hidden
truths in the real world of science will only find themselves lost in
a sea of confusion, finding things just, don't, add up.