🚀 go-pugleaf

On Sep 6, 11:21 pm, Benj <bjac...@iwaynet.net> wrote in sci.physics:
> On Sep 6, 4:33 pm, "Androcles" <Headmas...@Hogwarts.physics> wrote:
>
> > --
> > Please see this quite short video:
>
> >    http://archive.ncsa.uiuc.edu/Cyberia/NumRel/Movies/Smarr2.mov
>
> >            "Science and art are indistinguishable."
>
> >  http://www.paletaworld.org/dbimages/3263_1.jpg
>
> > ============================================
>
> Come on Andro!
> Modern Science and art ARE indistinguishable!
> Art never relies on an "explanation" or "cross-checking" with reality
> by experiment. It exists on it's own for what it is and must be
> accepted on those terms. Sure people try to "explain" art but they
> mostly fail. Who can explain art? Who can "explain" the beauty of pure
> mathematical expression?  Each piece stands on it's own merits without
> any outside support. And such it is with modern physics.  Mathematics
> is now the TRUE reality. There is no reality that exists outside of
> mathematical artistry. We have proved that beyond doubt in a recent
> thread right here in this group.
>
> Thus, it is mathematical ability and beauty that are the crowning
> measure of science achievement today and of course, the beauty of the
> mathematics of Einstein is the ultimate orgasm of the creative
> universe!  Thus, there now only remains one final question: Who here
> among us is to be the person to prove that he or she is to be the one
> "smarter than Einstein"?
>
> http://www.paletaworld.org/dbimages/3263_1.jpg

Yet Einsteinians do know the true name of Einstein's "beauty":

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/arts/main.jhtml?xml=/arts/2007/03/11/bosmo10.xml
"Einstein may have started the ROT. When experiment dominated physics,
his work was driven by aesthetic concerns. He sought beauty (notably
symmetry) in mathematical haiku that capture something complex,
transcendental and profound."

Pentcho Valev
pvalev@yahoo.com