🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.physics
Article #16395

Re: Maxwell Theory Paradox

#16395
From: ring_theory
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 21:02
47 lines
3324 bytes
"Dave" <noone@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:qeadnYk0fdfRCvffRVn-rA@crocker.com...
>
> "Wolfgang G. Gasser" <siehe@homepage.li> wrote in message
> news:d4duns$rth$1@atlas.ip-plus.net...
> > Maxwell's first equation can be written as well in differential as
> > in integral form. A special variant of the integral form is its
> > parallel-planes version:
>
> note, that this 'special variant' is only valid for static charges.  if
you
> go back to the full equations and get rid of the assumptions needed to
> reduce it to the simple statement you based your argument on you will see
> that everything is accounted for.
>
>

yea sure "everything is accounted for" I didn't get the memo that said
mankind has learned everything about physics!

In fact I'd say it's an *assumption* on your part.
What isn't accounted for is it's lack of mass.

What maxwell did in the mathematics is only part of what he was doing.
He was an inventor as well. He was working on a mechanism.

It comes down to, how can we drive a changing magnetic flux field through a
induction coil repeatedly? He discovered it would be a ring and did
experiments with rings noting unusual reactions.
I don't think he understood what it was about the ring that was special.

It's unity at rest. "in a table of natural sines the radius of the circle is
regarded as unity" a ring simply spinning is over-unity. how much over is
determined by it's frequency. Just as today the term over-unity brings much
opposition. I suspect maxwell encountered opposiition as well.

I'll not be thwarted like that. Spinning a multipole ring through induction
coils as a mechanism is a simple act. The real opposition is showing the
scientific community that it is self evident, as well as the method of
achieving over-unity, free-energy, perpetual motion, and anti gravity.

Wolfgang is correct in his observations if a multipole ring is used the
sequence of forces is the drive system of the mechanism. However it is in
the microscopic scale where no physical man made mechanism can exist.

Ring
Technical Details
Message-ID: <FJyae.14964$r53.6361@attbi_s21>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!wns13feed!worldnet.att.net!attbi_s21.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
References: <d4duns$rth$1@atlas.ip-plus.net> <qeadnYk0fdfRCvffRVn-rA@crocker.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,c4700ba4b29eba92
X-Google-Thread: 109d8a,c4700ba4b29eba92
X-Google-Thread: 1110fe,c4700ba4b29eba92
X-Google-Thread: 103d8c,c4700ba4b29eba92
X-Google-Thread: fa4c1,c4700ba4b29eba92
X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,gid109d8a,gid1110fe,gid103d8c,gidfa4c1,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!wns13feed!worldnet.att.net!attbi_s21.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From: "ring_theory" <ring_theory@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.math,sci.physics.electromag,de.sci.physik,fr.sci.physique
References: <d4duns$rth$1@atlas.ip-plus.net> <qeadnYk0fdfRCvffRVn-rA@crocker.com>
Subject: Re: Maxwell Theory Paradox
Lines: 50
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409
Message-ID: <FJyae.14964$r53.6361@attbi_s21>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.217.0.217
X-Complaints-To: abuse@mchsi.com
X-Trace: attbi_s21 1114290149 12.217.0.217 (Sat, 23 Apr 2005 21:02:29 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 21:02:29 GMT
Organization: AT&T ASP.att.net
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 21:02:29 GMT