🚀 go-pugleaf

EskWIRED@spamblock.panix.com wrote:
> In sci.physics.electromag Bill
>Hobba <rubbish@junk.com> wrote:
>
> > Rest of usual very long winded
> semantic junk snipped.
>
> I too think that this is semantics.

Yup, this is indeed "the study of meaning."
Unless your usage is the reprehensibly vulgar
"propaganda."

> The definition of reality, for
> example, limits the possibilities.

If we do not define reality... we are mad.
It is our social agreement on the purpose/use
(et al) of things (including ourselves)
which makes them sensible.

Think of a dog's brain, and what he makes of
the items in his master's house: Since most of
those items have no "dog use" they must not
register as they do to us. Therefore your dog
must think that you live in a heap of trash, a
clean, a synthetically perfumed dump. (Which
is why most dogs puzzle eternaly over their masters'
objection to their crapping all over the place, I'm
sure: "It's just a dump, forheavens'sake! Wolf!")

Reality is all. And we can hardly go about
thinking everything at the same time, now can we!

> Additionally, there is an underlying
> assumption that human senses can
> completely discern all existing dimensions,
> which is an unproven assumption.

This happens when you come in late into the
conversation: You are assuming that there are
such things as mathematical dimensions in
the universe apart from "our" three! This is a
bum assumption [that our reality is confined
to three dimensions] ... but if you go back up
this thread of posts you will eventually reach
the part where I point out your insanity (that's
my job). And then you too shall be cured!

> I'd appreciate comments on these observations
> by the OP.

OP
http://poems.sdrodrian.com
http://physics.sdrodrian.com
http://music.sdrodrian.com
http://mp3.sdrodrian.com


> A nation of sheep will beget a government of wolves.
> --Edward R. Murrow

A nation of wolves will make a bloody mess of any/all
governments proposed for them.  ---S D Rodrian



.
.
.