🚀 go-pugleaf

EskWIRED@spamblock.panix.com wrote:

> I cannot agree that "social agreement ... makes [things] sensible".

Please talk it over with your dog. And you'llassie I'm right.

> Additionally, that which is not sensible may nevertheless be real. Many
> wavelengths of electromagnetic radiation are not sensible, and were
> unknown prior to the invention of certain machines.  Nevertheless, they
> are real.

I think you're confusing cotton candy with radiation:

   All that existed before man existed. And all
   that will exist after Man will exist. But nobody
   made change for a dollar before Man, and no-
   body will laugh at a good joke after Man (nor
   at a bad one, smarty pants).      --SDR

> The same may hold true for spatial dimensions in excess of 3.

May I speak with your dog? I think it might be
more sensible...

Could I be more specific about what I mean?
Let's try:
              NOTHING CAN BE LIMITED TO
              "ANY" NUMBER OF DIMENSIONS.

If one abstracts the least single dimension from ANYTHING
it effectivey removes that something from reality. And then
you are talking fantasy (science-fiction).

Self-evidently, this must include ANY/ALL "dimension(s)"
which EXCLUDE ANY OTHER "dimension(s)."

  PLEASE RE-READ this thread from the original post!

String theory is marvelous mathematics. But if ANY part of it
depends on the existence of Santy Claus, then it has NO
connection with reality PERIOD. And since string theory
can only balance its equations by piling on extraneous (e.g.
impossible) "dimensions" it is pure FICTION--"pure/absolute."

> > > Additionally, there is an underlying
> > > assumption that human senses can
> > > completely discern all existing dimensions,
> > > which is an unproven assumption.
>
> > This happens when you come in late into the
> > conversation: You are assuming that there are
> > such things as mathematical dimensions in
> > the universe apart from "our" three!
>
> No, not quite.  I am assuming that the possibility exists that there are
> more than 3 spatial dimension.

And I am telling you there ain't nothin' that ain't made up
of all the innumerable (look up that word in a book called
The Dictionary) dimensions of our reality.

IF SOMETING LACKS EXISTENCE IN ANY
DIMENSION (or part thereof) IT CANNOT EXIST.
(And if something exists in one or more dimension
than those of our reality... then those so-called other
"dimensions" are superflous: PURE FANTASY.)

String Theory is pure mathematics ONLY. Get over it.
Rejoice, in fact. Now you won't have to waste your life
trying to figure out how string theory governs life!

>? I have no strong opinion on whether such
> dimensions are real.

Then prey tell, what be U doing in this conversation?

> I concede that they are not presently sensible.  I
> hold open the possibility that, with unknown technology, they may become
> sensible.

What about ghosts? And pixies? And gods? And
those beings that consist only of unglued eyes with ears
stuck to them...?

S D Rodrian
http://poems.sdrodrian.com
http://physics.sdrodrian.com
http://music.sdrodrian.com
http://mp3.sdrodrian.com