Article View: sci.physics
Article #16819Re: Big bang question
From: S D Rodrian
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 23:15
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 23:15
68 lines
3670 bytes
3670 bytes
erichosick@hotmail.com (EricH) wrote in message news:<ca9bc9e3.0112121140.dda7b69@posting.google.com>... > So this is what I am to understand > that you have said in part: You are to understand that, yes. However, I did not say it--I typed it on my little toy computer keyboard. > A: It is the universe that produces > our thoughts, and not our brains. Correct: There are no thoughts which brains did not get stuffed with by the universe: I spit on brains, messieur. This is why it's the "brain" (so-called) which happens to be in the correct spot at exact-a-ment THE time... which hits upon the thought. BECAUSE it is not the brain that is important but the conjunction of the time et loo moment. You could put a monkey's brain in the place of Newton when that apple fell off the tree and today we would have a mathematics with more of a tail to it--Guaranteed! And math would be a barrel of fun. > B: There are no paradoxes in nature, only > in the human mind (that's > the ONLY "place" in which a thought can exist). Certainly: Thoughts don't exist in Nature! Have you ever run across a rock with the least thought? (Even if it had one, how could it publish it in the local newspaper?) > Could you elaborate on these two points? Of course! Let's see... Ah! You have been bitten by a van-pire, messieur. I recommend you immediately ingest a steak. S D Rodrian poems.sdrodrian.com physics.sdrodrian.com > - Eric Dennis Towne <sodaaaaa@xirr.com> wrote in message news:<3C166251.712483EF@xirr.com> to Eric... > SDR is a well known usenet crackpot. Leave him alone! He may be the person to finally glue me back up together again. > You waste your time and ours > responding to him. FYI. > -dennis T But, doesn't that mean that you yourself waste your time and everybody's twice over by responding to those who respond to him. FBI --?!?! Why is it the guy who calls the other guy stupid is usually the stupider of the two guys? Because I say so.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<bf7b874e.0112121514.11dfa3e2@posting.google.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<9p7rje$q7r$1@ins22.netins.net> <bf7b874e.0111231718.38d0cafc@posting.google.com> <3C05489E.1FA988CD@yahoo.com> <bf7b874e.0111281656.29f7c16b@posting.google.com> <3C05DD14.3C8A724A@yahoo.com> <bf7b874e.0111290450.33fd9d97@posting.google.com> <k%aO7.14004$2Fd.9688@news1.bloor.is> <bf7b874e.0112041145.35307166@posting.google.com> <ca9bc9e3.0112091601.6edf6bfa@posting.google.com> <bf7b874e.0112102310.69346ab2@posting.google.com> <ca9bc9e3.0112121140.dda7b69@posting.google.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10f2fd,dce0242ed60dda7c X-Google-Attributes: gid10f2fd,public X-Google-Thread: fdc67,dce0242ed60dda7c X-Google-Attributes: gidfdc67,public X-Google-Thread: 10b271,dce0242ed60dda7c X-Google-Attributes: gid10b271,public X-Google-Thread: f871d,dce0242ed60dda7c X-Google-Attributes: gidf871d,public X-Google-Thread: f442a,dce0242ed60dda7c X-Google-Attributes: gidf442a,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-12-12 15:15:00 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: sdr@sdrodrian.com (S D Rodrian) Newsgroups: sci.physics,gac.physics.astronomy,alt.sci.physics,alt.chaos,alt.astronomy Subject: Re: Big bang question Date: 12 Dec 2001 15:15:00 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Lines: 68 Message-ID: <bf7b874e.0112121514.11dfa3e2@posting.google.com> References: <9p7rje$q7r$1@ins22.netins.net> <bf7b874e.0111231718.38d0cafc@posting.google.com> <3C05489E.1FA988CD@yahoo.com> <bf7b874e.0111281656.29f7c16b@posting.google.com> <3C05DD14.3C8A724A@yahoo.com> <bf7b874e.0111290450.33fd9d97@posting.google.com> <k%aO7.14004$2Fd.9688@news1.bloor.is> <bf7b874e.0112041145.35307166@posting.google.com> <ca9bc9e3.0112091601.6edf6bfa@posting.google.com> <bf7b874e.0112102310.69346ab2@posting.google.com> <ca9bc9e3.0112121140.dda7b69@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 128.123.24.84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1008198900 6753 127.0.0.1 (12 Dec 2001 23:15:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 12 Dec 2001 23:15:00 GMT