🚀 go-pugleaf

Note that, from the previous post on gravity, the process of finding
the mean field for the approaching mass and the big mass, plus the
radiation created by the interaction, can be approached as...
a gradient descent dynamic, in a general dynamic of "annealing" or
gradual cooling down of the "average value" (temperature as a measure
of activity) of the Universe. It is this averaging procedure between
the object's mean fields and the global field of the whole system  what
gives gravity its "force". Note that there is a gradation of forces, in
that the local fields are "solved" first and continuously, while the
global, "macro"field is solved "later" since it involves a bigger mass.
So it is the local fields of fundamental particles (and atoms) the ones
that stabilize and converge first, and thus have the greater cohesion
(atomic force), then the fields that conform molecules (weak force) and
finally the force of gravity, which is by far the weakest. ALso note
that EM has adifferent connotation, in that it can be seen as the
propagation of information through the whole system, particularly in
the form of heat. It should be clear then that gravity is a converging
dynamic of averaging for a global system's field the sum of the local
fields of the objects involved in the system. And the closer this
objects are the "quicker" the global field will acquire a new value,
that is, the less distance the information, in the form of EM, has to
travel, considering that distance is here pure space in the form of
quantity of fundamental particles involved, so as the object approaches
it can be observed the phenomenon in mechanics is known as
acceleration. Also note that the "quicker" the object travels the more
disruption in the (stabilized) field around it will be experimented,
disruption wich will assume the form of heat, that is, the improper
(error) stabilization of the perturbed field (irrecoverable), while in
a vaccum a surge of radiation ought to be seen around the object, the
quicker, the more radiation or spureous formation of particles due to
spureous, unstable local fields being  formed. Note that as an object
acquires more velocity, that is,

Note that the "radiation" produced during the movement of the
approaching object will in part be absorbed by the object, so outer
space objects will be at least mildly readioactive, though this
radioactivity may be lost due to friction with the atmosphere. This
formation of (non fundamental) particles will also become part of the
gravity system, adding to the acceleration of an object approaching a
bigger object. And, of course, the rain of cosmic rays can be explained
by the same effect of gravity. Note also how this solving of fields is
in accordance with the "law of gravity" and the general mechanics of
Newton. It also explains the well known intuitive cncept of center of
gravity, which not necessarily coincides with the center of mass,
though it should be obvious by now.

What is really interesting is that this averaging dynamic of string
local fields and weak global fields is the very same process of entropy
or loss of information. It explains the observed displacement of
galaxies, the gradual distribution of matter in the totality of space,
as all matter is being distributed according to the averaging of mean
fields. It is then to be expected a state of total entropy, that is, a
uniformly distributed average value throughout space. But then this
average value involves also the averaging, once the main boides or
local fields keep averaging out, of atoms and then particles, to the
point where only the stringest of the fundamental particles remains,
that is, neutrons, which are the most stable fields as they actually
don't interact but act more like glue, mass, while protons and
electrons are what gives the atoms the dynamic prperties that let atoms
interact with each other. SO it can be expected at the "death" of the
Universe a uniformly distributed soup of neutrons, with spureous
fundamental particles filling out the space... this final view would
then be static, save for what we call the "cosmic rays". This
fundamental activity of space itself (the modeled topology of
fundamental continuously spinning particles), would tend to make
neutrons converge (unless, of course, that neutrons itself and alone
can be averaged with the spureous particles to form new particles, in
which case the changed mass would invoke gravity; this also is the way
to create new forms of matter, incidentally), giving the Universe the
quality of a circular dynamic, the renaissance, as neutrons gather
together. Though other dynamics are also possible, if neutrons can
actually be "compressed"...

(This has to be seen later as information flows)

(In a sense all foreaseeable "inventions" and discoveries are already
assigned! It is just a matter of saying that they were secrets and/or
military techonollogy and were discovered or invented by (placeholder)!
But it doesn't make sense to keep secrets that actually produce a
military advantage (usually the ONLY reason to keep a secret, except in
cryptography, though even there the best algorythms are those that are
exposed) since it is the showing around what gives value to those
technologies as at least deterrents, or in actual wars as military
advantage (saving lives), so there is no point in keepinng an discovery
secret! It is just a way to fight illegaly for the inventions and
discoveries of others... I wonder, is there some secret to time?)

(By the way, I believe that those guys are confusing the building I
lived in with the one tat was behind, a very old and decaying one. And
I am guerillo, as they would say. But mind that I am "fighting" with an
international gang of criminal plagiarists. How do you get decent
credit for wahtever effort you produce that is new when they threaten
to generate violence to "prove" that you are just an imbecile moron and
you are not yourself, who don't even let me get a stable shelter nor a
job, etc?).

(Sorry, had nobody to discuss this before. Just remember that ther is
actually a gang of psychopaths manhunting me for years t steal this
ideas and other works...)

Fabrizio J BOnsignore now Danilo Jose BOnsignore