🚀 go-pugleaf

fbonsignore@beethoven.com wrote:
Notice that time is already implied here in dependence to force. The
oneness of the objects will be conserved depending on the simultaneous
and then sequencial setting on recursive mean fields among multitudes
of fundamental particules (under the notion of infomation or mere
numeric value); these mean fields would be solved simultaneously at the
level of object, molecule, atom... fundamental particle, which in
essence means that information will be propagated accordingly to each
level, withot disrupting "nature" of the object unless the propagation
of information is of such nature that information is lost at some point
between these mean fields, that is, the velocity (in this case the
difference between values) of change is such that the intermediate mean
fields can no longher recover their previous values. This differences
will be propagated throughout the structure of the object along all
previous values (which may be in different dynamics among themselves)
up to the point where the difference between new and previous values
can actually stabilize within the limits of what can be considered a
unique, stable, avergaed mean value. The objects in colision will break
if the informational change at the boundary cannot be propagated with
enough velocity (big difference between pervious and future mean
fields) throughout the object, introducing enough disorder internally
as to make the once single, averaged field, (object) aquire enough
internal difference in values as to make two (or more) new
object-global fields with the same value. SO force can be seen as
rapidity of information change at the boundary and its effect noticed
as propagation of mean values along the internal coherent structure of
objects. Notice that for small forces the effect will stabilize "near"
the border, while for bigger forces the propagation of values won't
stabilize til it affects the whole structure of the object, in the
extreme being so disruptive that the once dynamically stable mean field
is disrupted an converted into a set of...

smaller stable mean fields, those whose coherence is beager as their,
lets call them, absolute values, are such that their mean field changed
less than the change at the boundaries. Of course, this smaller sets
are what we call molecules, them atoms, then... It means that values
are, within lumped together mean field, more akin, more similar than
those mean fields whose average lies "in" the border of such smaller
sets. Note also that for objects whose, lets call it average mean field
value, is very "high", a colision will tend to bond them together! Yet
we don't observe that phenomenon of "bonding" normally: what we observe
is what we call friction, though all these observations are at "normal
temperature".

Fabrizio J BOnsignore now Danilo J BOnsignore