🚀 go-pugleaf

[Looks like "they" are threatening to actually kill people just like
that because I am writing this just like that! Looks like *somebody*
sold what is mine not being his to people who pretend it to be theirs
while I didn't receive but humiliations while writing all I've written
the last year...]

It is easy to see how matter reacts under high temperature and low
temperature interaction of bodies for homogeneous and heterogeneous
bodies, under conditions of sudden and gradual change, including
colisions and explosions (very quick transmission of values resulting
in spureous bodies). The important point is that it is the interactibg
field's informational content of objects being propagated and
simultaneously set for the llocal fields what determines thhe dynamic
of the systems medium-object and medium-object-object, where the change
at the boundary of the local mean fields will determine their stability
in terms of the global mean field of the object. Mind that all fields,
local and global,  are recursively and *simultaneously* set, that is,
they aquire new values, the errors or differences (that is, change),
being dissipatedthroughout the whole system, (in this case, an
absolutely isolated system (in Greniewskys's terms). Yet thus
simulatenity of mean fields needstoo be propagated, that is, needs to
affect all particles-values  conforming the whiole system, which is in
essence the flow of changes that we perceive as time (change).

{Here time is linked directlly to space, considering that a system
composed only of unchanging  fundamental particles (whatever their
value),  would be essentially timeless or  pure Being; even space as
distance being neutralized  since nothing would travel, though space
would then be defined as differences of beings, though 'being' all
particles (monads in Leibnitz terms) equal then there would be only a
single essence, tieless, unchanging and undifferentiated, a wholeness
that would have no space, for it would be One. This is the "reason" why
 it has to be assumed or postulated from the beginning an ever
changing, 'fundamental particle' [more on it later], [even if we can
later, as the model is being formalized, drop the concept and
substitute it for a more appropriate construction]. Note that even in
terms of logic this pure model would also be TRUE, though it would not
be neither Good nor Beautiful, as there would be no opposites to
establish the quality, the axiological hierarchy we call values [which
implies poles and difference], a matter that incidentally solves the
philosophical problem of the Universals: Truth cannot be equated with
Goodness nor Beauty, nor are they eternal as Reality is in essence
Change.}

Fabrizio J Bonsignore, now Danilo Jose Bonsignore
[Danielo as it is pronounced and now with $33 of welfare! Which of
course doesn't make me happy, which implies that I do expect some
market recognitin of all my efforts...  despite being attacked
repeatedly by targeted theft...]