🚀 go-pugleaf

Note that the unidirectional line of time is implied in a very simple
sense in this model. Simply put, the informational support needed to
"go back in time" is such that a series of new universes would be
needed to hold all the information to reproduce previous states of this
Universe plus the information to "navigate them". The whole story of
the Universe would need to be stored AND those stories (every step in
the dynamic life of the UNiverse) would need to be COMPLETELY STATIC,
otherwise each Universe would mutate and continue forming a new,
parallel Universe, leaving behind a new story... Ad infinitum. And
where would the story of time travel lie? It would automatically modify
the previous story, but it has to be static or wouldn't be story, so at
most it can be a "simulated time travel", or in other words, a
successful prediction of the next state of the Universe having effect
on the current state of the Universe, but only as information on future
state of events, without real matter transfer. In some sense, all
objects "come from the future" as their coherence is expected to
continue in the future, and the past is Absolute Truth, as it is
unchanging and fully "known"! But mind that "some" story may be
"stored" in alternate dimensions (continually created in essence
orthogonally for each "instant", though this would not be possible in a
simply layered model but in one where adjacencies are also continually
changing and increasing in connections, in a way that would resemble
the increase in connections in a self learning neural network, which
can evoke ideas of the Master mind of the Universe or God), or,
alternatively, in a continuously increasing set of particles, an
expanding Universe in the sense of being "aggrandized", objects being
formed by particles each instant more separated, in which case objects
would not be stable at all, as the mean field would change by including
the information contained "within" and matter itself would change
properties at any "instant"! But again, this new "Historic" Universes
would have to be included in the solution of the local and global mean
fields! So the possibility of time travel is banned as it would
continuously change the local and global mean fields and thuis the
properties of matter! Of course, some kind of historic infomration,
like particular instances saved from time to time can be _postulated_
but then it imples a separate control, what some would like to equate
with God, but by definition this model is a model of Reality, of
EVERYTHING there is, including any possible God, and "saving space"
would need to be defined separately, violating the simplicity and the
*purpose* of this model. So, for those interested, it is the Universe
itself which is "God", interpretation which doesn't preculde from other
possibilities more akin to what people usually identifies with GOD.
(Particularly, the dynamic solution of the mean field of the whole
model at any moment can be equated, through the implicit definition of
adjacencies (either ordered and set inherently or following other
configurations), to the same working of connectionist systems like
barins, interpretation which essentially means that the whole state of
the Universe is the current evolution or step of a Master Mind or
Universal Mind, where Galaxies can be equated to particular "thoughts",
etc...

(No se hagan ya payasos: no soy puto ni porque me maten, y mi celibato
no es prueba mas que de que su pais fue un pais muy poco propicio par
un extranjero. Y ya no jueguen con sus redirecciones que yo soy el que
esta solo y ustedes son un grupo.)

Fabrizio J Bonsignore now Danilo J Bonsignore