🚀 go-pugleaf

Note that in this formalizer of bits, the previous message appeared as
was written and not changed the way it would change if it is being
channeled through another rogue formalizer of bits first. The log in
mail is too confused as it is serializing many hints and ideas. There
is one third before in my line who does look like those four sided
builders. I am still exposed to second form of matter objects falling
on my bits controller...

Note that in this model, postulated as an ordered space in three
dimensions, the notion of a gravity geometry can be approximated
through probabilities. The key point is that the fundamental particle
in continuous unstable change may assume *unstable* values for some
"duration", that is, assuming a "normal" frequency of change for a
particle's value, it can actualllly lower its "rate of change", so some
values are "fixed", or remain for a longer time before changing, and
this perturbed rate of change is dependent on the values of adjacent or
nearby fundamental particles. In the vicinity of a stable field (a well
formed object), free fundamental particles will be more probable to
become magnetized by its neighbors, to lag in their values, than those
far away of an object, even if those values manage to form stable mean
fields with a short life span. This spureous formations of interrelated
magnetized fundamental particles are what we call radiation, alpha
particles, cosmic rays, solar wind, etc. It means that in the vicinity
of big objects in space there will be a maelstrom of particles
precisely because of that vicinity and related to the size of the
object! But now note that from the point of view of a mean field, for a
big enough object the value of the mean field of any approaching object
will be negligible, its values adding little to it, but for the
object's mean field there will be a "tendency" to "augment" in value,
that is, to approach the mean value as it is included in the
(recursive) bigger mean field! The approaching object's mean value
would be "too small" (mass) to force the bigger, global mean field to
change value, but the global field of both masses will acquire a new
mean value which will be a function of both objects, as it will now
include more mass (which can be approached as the simple count of
fundamental particles in the system), including those spureous
particles "created" by the approaching object! So the global mean
field, including the big mass, the approaching value and the
*increased* radiation field will make the global field to "grow" in
value! As the objects approach, this global mean field value will grow,
eventually approaching a "unity" (always depending on units of course),
where unity means that both objects now form what can be considered a
new, single, unitary object. It is this dynamic of the global mean
field value what is experienced as the geometry of the gravity well...

Fabrizio J Bonsignore now Danilo J Bonsignore
You have a keylogger in this IP or inbuilt in Windows.
You are a terrorist. Leprechaun. I don't care who is protecting the
other L Leprechaun: you are destabilizing the world and it is plain
wrong. I alone against a group... but I am not L nor I am an idealist
even if you call me L, it is the simple fact that you are unneeded and
we ALL can live better without your opposition. Whoever claimed or
complained about the angular moment post is the Leprechaun of the
defeated island.
I believe the guys in the CINVESTAV have been *very*aware* of this
"bursted" model. The one posting this is not a Leprechaun even if this
one can look like it. They call the guys who built piramids Am erica
nos. This is a discovery trip, no substances implied...