🚀 go-pugleaf

fbonsignore@beethoven.com wrote:
> See the rest of the posts in ny.general and looking by author or
> searching Fabrizio J. Bonsignore, sort by date, in google groups.
>
> Note from the last post that being the Universe essentially the process
>
> of solving for equilibrium the mean field for an infinite set of
> inifinitely valued values (or at most granular at the planck constant
> value for this Universe), an adequate model for the dynamic of the
> Universe, is the process of annealing from the initial set of
> infinitely valued fundamental particles and initial value to the final
> mean field value (thermal death), considering that the (possibly)
> infinite subfields would also apply this dynamic in a recursive manner.
>
> (This idea I discussed in San Antonio in August 2003, no political time
>
> machine implied here). Examples of the (sub)process would be the
> forming of (spontaneous) solar systems, (natural) galaxies, and of
> course the evolution and dynamic of both life and intelligence,
> considering that human intelligence is also solvable through the same
> approach of annealing over connectionist systems. Since this seems to
> be the main organizing process for this type of Universes (other
> possible Universes would uses other dynamics), there is the possibility
>
> of expressing chemistry and most bioloigical processes using the same
> algorythm... And otehr disciplines would follow the same fundsamental
> rule (see theory of beliefs and possibilty of telepathy)...
>
>
> Danilo Jose Bonsignore, previously called Fabrizio Jose Bonsignore
> Guardia

[Mind that this approach is in debt to a computer systems cosmovision.
The paradygm of identical processors working in parallel and deriving
results from the interconnection of the whole is powerful enough to
express most objects. There is no necessity for more complex
constructions when results can be derived by recurring to simple
objects working together and simple rules linking them. Sounds a little
bit like the Matrix... a useful insight!]

A dire possibility is that our universe is in fact the expression of a
single "fundamental" particle being built in a higher level universe in
turn the expression of a "fundamental" particle being built... ad
infinitum. In this vision we would be in a state of continuous
creation. But then mind that intelligence (Reason) creates new
constructs that cannot be readily expressed in terms of the single mean
field reaching equilibrium paradigm. It is Reason that creates new
complexity.

(It seems this attracted the envy of some people with power... they
have to understand that power is to serve and so useful things and
cannot enter in competition with creativity.)

Fabrizio J Bonsignore now Danilo J Bonsignore