🚀 go-pugleaf

Alpha: Universe clusters are the expression of the expansion of all
possible numbers toward Infinity. The Planck constant is the value of
the fundamental spin that gave birth to this particular Universe.

Actually the problem of whether the Universe is expanding or is stable
is te problem of whether we are a particle being stabilized in a higher
level Universe being born or we are the inner dynamic of an already
stable particle in a higher level Universe. (Note that the idea of a
cluster of Universes is equivalent to the forming of a stable atom in
our Reality-Universe).

This approach must be understood in the sense that even if there is no
_direct_ communication between spatially distanced particles, the
moment that they are participants of some field being solved for
equilibrium implies immediately a relation, or a correlation, that (is)
the final solution for that particluar field being evaluated. At any
moment there is an infinite number, any number of particluar mean
fields being solved at the same the big UNiversal field is being solved
for equilibrium, that is, the whole UNiverse. This is the reason why
spatially distanced particles can exhibit similar or identical
behaviour as if there was some connection, but ut is actually only the
expression that there (is) a mean field being solved, and its solution
depends on the totality of particles involved in that particluar field
solved. THis is akin to the Jung uian idea of holism as expressed in
the I ching, in the sense that the moment, this moment, is a resultant
of EVERYTHING, and even small parts of it, like the coin or the
matches, determine THIS particluar moment. Yet the future cannot be
REALLY divined (saved for the automatisms we call Causality, which may
be actually spureous over long times), since the mean field does not
depend on particular particles assuming particles values, but on the
totality of it, which is the meaning of Chaos, non forecastability.
Reality is in the end opaque, as the inner structure of the particles
we brake is indeed anoter UNiverse as complex as ths one we live in,
only that its inner structures are too _small_ to be actually
discernible, though of course there is always the possibility that this
is the basic, or first level Universe, so the most we can achieve is to
try to observe the fundamental particle, which in this model is equated
with actual void, the void we relate to a virtual soup (spins
continually changing forming spureous particles and virtual particles,
that is, particles that cannot stabilize in this Universe given the
values of their spins).

This is also the view of Einstein, that Nature is simpler than we
expect and its us who add the complexity. For there is also the
possibility that, in the infinite (transcardinal?) possibilities of
particles being stabilized as mean fields, annealing, strange
formations can actually arise, much more strange than any we have in
this Universe, since complexity may arise spontaneously in stable
forms. So our laws of physics may actually be just a set of the total
possible laws of physics both for this Universe and for all universes
possible. That is, the laws of physics may have actually change with
time, even if at any moment they rule in the whole unievrse, as they
are the resultant of inner structures being formed during the solving
of the mean field of this Universe. Yet it has to be taken into account
that even with a single process, that of annealing, taking place at the
Uiverse level, there is an infinite number of paths that can be
followed, each one determining the rest of the future evolution of this
particluar system (closed system in the sense of Greniewsky). making
laws of physics very stable, since they were "chosen" during the first
moments of the expansion from the fundamental particle into the rest of
this Universe.

Fabrizio J Bonsignore, now Danilo J Bonsignore
ghamac.org  now with somewhat full beard