Article View: sci.physics
Article #3352Re: Radioactive Cat: How Dangerous is She?
From: gary l. schroeder
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1992 18:38
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1992 18:38
52 lines
3035 bytes
3035 bytes
In article <+btn-xl.badboy@netcom.com> badboy@netcom.com (Jay Keller) writes: >I have some more facts to add to the discussion. The isotope in question is, >as many have suggested, I-131 with a half-life of approximately 8 days. The >cat is first injected with a small dose of Technetium which allows a scan to >be done to evaluate the situation. Then the Iodine dosage is determined and >it is administered. At this point the cat remains in the hospital for about >a week. >I am told that the state of California forbids them to release the cat until >it is emitting less than 2 mR/hr. Interesting. >What that means I don't know, but I'm sure someone here will. Is it >milliRoentgens, milliRads, milliRems, or milli-something-elses? I suspect that >it is nothing to worry about. The people working at the clinic are exposed to >several of these hot cats every day and seem to feel that they aren't in any >danger, based on monitoring their personal dosages. That's 2 mR/hr as in _milli-roentgens_. This is roughly equivalent to 2 millirem/hr. (Roentgen is a measure of absolute exposure, rem is a unit of dose.) To give you a comparison, in the United States, radiation workers are allowed to recieve 5,000 mrem in a year. It is assumed that at or below this level of exposure, no deleterious health effects will be observed. To give you another comparison, we all recieve about 150 - 200 mrem per year from background radiation sources (even up to 270 mrem/yr in Denver, Colarado). You also have to bear in mind that we're dealing with an 8 day half-life isotope, if we take excretion into account, the _effective_ half-life is even less than this (probably a lot less). So, kitty won't be reading 2 mR/hr for long after she leaves the hospital. Additionally, you'd have to be hugging your cat all the time to constantly recieve 2 mrem/hr. I assume that they measure the cat at contact, not at a distance. You'll probably be several feet or even yards away most of the time and radiation intensity drops off as 1/distance^2. Basically, don't sweat it. The rules are pretty strict on these things and they wouldn't be giving you a pet back that was going to threaten your health. >I will ask about taking iodine supplements to avoid any uptake of the I-131. >Thanks to the person who suggested this. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Gary L. Schroeder | schroede@bnlux1.bnl.gov | Boo. Brookhaven National Laboratory |
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Sep25.183824.594@bnlux1.bnl.gov>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!newsserver.pixel.kodak.com!psinntp!psinntp!bnlux1.bnl.gov!schroedeReferences:
<yfpnc!g.badboy@netcom.com> <+btn-xl.badboy@netcom.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.physics,rec.pets.cats Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!newsserver.pixel.kodak.com!psinntp!psinntp!bnlux1.bnl.gov!schroede From: schroede@bnlux1.bnl.gov (gary l. schroeder) Subject: Re: Radioactive Cat: How Dangerous is She? Message-ID: <1992Sep25.183824.594@bnlux1.bnl.gov> Organization: Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973 References: <yfpnc!g.badboy@netcom.com> <+btn-xl.badboy@netcom.com> Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1992 18:38:24 GMT Lines: 52