🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.physics
Article #3813

Re: Cheap laser possible?

#3813
From: David Knapp
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1992 16:46
28 lines
1549 bytes
In article <1992Sep25.122819.29025@alf.uib.no> sigurd@novaja.NoSubdomain.NoDomain (Sigurd Tjelmeland) writes:
>I have understood that one of the most expensive parts
>of a laser is the mirror that lets just a little light
>through. What would happen if one substituted this
>with a fully reflecting mirror with some small holes
>drilled in it. Of course this would set up some
>interference pattern on the beam, but would a laser
>beam be produced this way?
>
>Just curious,
>
>Sigurd 
>e-mail: sigurd@imr.no
>


My mail to you bounced. What you've described is 'edge coupling' and 
it works fine in many instances.  Yes, diffraction interference can be
a problem in the near field.

For a 'cheap laser' you might be interested in a nitrogen laser which requires
no vacuum or mirrors.


If you want to discuss this more, just write.
-- 
David Knapp                                      University of Colorado, Boulder
Perpetual Student                                   knapp@spot.colorado.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1992Sep27.164608.13439@ucsu.Colorado.EDU>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!van-bc!ubc-cs!destroyer!gumby!wupost!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!ames!agate!boulder!ucsu!spot.Colorado.EDU!knapp
References: <1992Sep25.122819.29025@alf.uib.no>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!van-bc!ubc-cs!destroyer!gumby!wupost!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!ames!agate!boulder!ucsu!spot.Colorado.EDU!knapp
From: knapp@spot.Colorado.EDU (David Knapp)
Subject: Re: Cheap laser possible?
Message-ID: <1992Sep27.164608.13439@ucsu.Colorado.EDU>
Sender: news@ucsu.Colorado.EDU (USENET News System)
Nntp-Posting-Host: spot.colorado.edu
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
References: <1992Sep25.122819.29025@alf.uib.no>
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1992 16:46:08 GMT
Lines: 28