Article View: sci.physics
Article #3832Re: Relativity and Objective Probability
From: Daryl McCullough
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 03:26
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 03:26
16 lines
854 bytes
854 bytes
In article <19vrk7INN880@smaug.West.Sun.COM>, Richard.Mathews@West.Sun.COM (Richard M. Mathews) writes: >>But what is not relativistically invariant is the change from the wave >>function before detection to the wave function after detection. > >Only if you believe that the wave function is something that physically >exists... That was the whole point of this thread---that the wave function *can't* be physical, and be consistent with relativity. If you already agree with this conclusion, then great. Daryl McCullough ORA Corp. Ithaca, NY
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Sep28.032647.22760@oracorp.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!psinntp!scylla!darylShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.physics Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!psinntp!scylla!daryl From: daryl@oracorp.com (Daryl McCullough) Subject: Re: Relativity and Objective Probability Message-ID: <1992Sep28.032647.22760@oracorp.com> Organization: ORA Corporation Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 03:26:47 GMT Lines: 17