Re: Measuring Q

Article View: sci.physics

Article #3865

#3865

From: Bronis Vidugiris
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 20:30

11 lines
931 bytes

In article <4350@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us> snarfy@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us writes:

)   Ah! You must be an engineer.  In  your  case  you  measure  instantaneous
)   changes in Q by paying a technician to do it.
)
)   I'm available.

Instantaneous?  That's one *damn* fast technician :-) :-) :-)

I'd be satisfied if I could get a mere 10 billion measurements per day - 
instantaneity has always seemed out of the question.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Sep28.203008.17160@lmpsbbs.comm.mot.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ftpbox!mothost!lmpsbbs!areaplg2.corp.mot.com!bhv

References: <4350@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: sci.physics
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ftpbox!mothost!lmpsbbs!areaplg2.corp.mot.com!bhv
From: bhv@areaplg2.corp.mot.com (Bronis Vidugiris)
Subject: Re: Measuring Q
Organization: Motorola, CCR&D, CORP, Schaumburg, IL
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1992 20:30:08 GMT
Message-ID: <1992Sep28.203008.17160@lmpsbbs.comm.mot.com>
Keywords: FTL Communications Experiment
References: <4350@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us>
Sender: news@lmpsbbs.comm.mot.com (Net News)
Nntp-Posting-Host: 137.23.47.37
Lines: 11

Reply to Parent Message