🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Sep29.212630.1@tnclus.tele.nokia.fi>, hporopudas@tnclus.tele.nokia.fi writes:
|> 
|>  my aphorism:
|> >  >
|> >  >   "Mads so. peoples without self-disipline, become entangled only in
|> >  >    pleasant's trap when they only choose pleasant instead of good, and they
|> >  >    get lost so. they do not ever reach the goal to become happy."
|> 
|> >
|> > This is not what was discussed. Keep to the subject!
|> > Or do you confuse science and atheism with pleasure-seeking and undiscipline?
|> > If that's the case, you are mistaken. Learn what the words mean before using
|> > them.
|> >
|> > Kim0
|> 
|>   Yes it was.

um, no it wasn't ... the discussion centered on whether atheistic scientists
were responsible for the "suffering" of "ordinary" people.

|>   One lesson to 'undeveloped peoples':
|>   Man chooses between good and pleasant (not between good and evil):
|> 
|>  "Good is one, pleasant is an another matter. These two lead man to very
|>   different goals. Who chooses good, will become happy. Who keeps pleasant
|>   better, will loose his goal. Wises let never pleasant delude themself.
|>   They choose good. Mads become entangled only in pleasant's toils and they
|>   get lost.

One lesson for Hannu:

If someone chooses not to believe in a god it is not because it is a "pleasant"
thing to do. Rather, they believe it is the truth, and they believe it is
"good" to accept the truth.

small language hint:

"Mads so," "Mads," and "Wises" are not english words or phrases.

Larry Edwards