Article View: sci.physics
Article #4176Re: Religion & Physics Don't Mix
From: Cameron Randale Bass
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 1992 18:32
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 1992 18:32
54 lines
2952 bytes
2952 bytes
In article <6201@tuegate.tue.nl> johan@blade.stack.urc.tue.nl (Johan Wevers) writes:
>Cameron Randale Bass writes:
>
>>>> Actually, most core doctrine is taken on faith. There ain't no
>>>> way to determine the 'truth' of faith. It's 'true' until the
>>>> last adherent dies, after which may be debate.
>
>>>You can believe in something that can be proven wrong. What's the point?
>
>> I don't know? Does there have to be a 'point'?
>
>Yes. If something is proven wrong and you still believe in it you're
>views about the world are inconsistent.
I don't think you understand. There may well be a difference
between 'reality' and 'appearance'. And, this 'proving wrong'
is a very tricky business outside of science.
>> You seem to be having difficulties with delineation between
>> science and religion. Let me help you out, if you're talking about
>> 'gods' your rules for science do not necessarily apply. Similarly,
>> in science there is no place for unfalsifiable concepts like 'God'.
>
>Hmmm. I conclude from this that your opinion about science is an
>instrumentalistic one: you use it to describe some things you want
>to measure.
You may *not* conclude that my views are 'instrumentalistic'.
That does not, however, mean that I only recognize my own view as
the sole valid viewpoint.
>My view is realistic: I believe that there exists a reality, independant
>wether we know this or not. The main thing QM has to learn us about this
>is that the interaction between observers and the rest of reality is not
>always neglectable.
So you agree that there exist leprechauns, whether we see them or not?
>Therefore, I believe in only one reality. This reality can be described
>by science. I've never seen any hint that there exists anything more.
Feel free. Recognize, however, that there are other, perfectly
valid, 'realities'. In fact, every major religion has a different
'reality', Machian positivism represents another one.
You can no more prove them wrong than you can prove you exist.
dale bass
--
C. R. Bass crb7q@virginia.edu
Department of Mechanical,
Aerospace and Nuclear Engineering
University of Virginia (804) 924-7926
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Nov6.183240.24418@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!sgiblab!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!uvaarpa!murdoch!kelvin.seas.Virginia.EDU!crb7qReferences:
<6163@tuegate.tue.nl> <1992Nov4.173327.16136@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <6201@tuegate.tue.nl>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.physics Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!sgiblab!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!uvaarpa!murdoch!kelvin.seas.Virginia.EDU!crb7q From: crb7q@kelvin.seas.Virginia.EDU (Cameron Randale Bass) Subject: Re: Religion & Physics Don't Mix Message-ID: <1992Nov6.183240.24418@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> Sender: usenet@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU Organization: University of Virginia References: <6163@tuegate.tue.nl> <1992Nov4.173327.16136@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <6201@tuegate.tue.nl> Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 18:32:40 GMT Lines: 54