Article View: sci.physics
Article #4214Re: Solid-state doesn't use QED! (Was Re: Particle Research)
From: Cameron Randale Bass
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 1992 03:44
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 1992 03:44
20 lines
1545 bytes
1545 bytes
In article <1992Nov6.233219.15750@galois.mit.edu> jbaez@riesz.mit.edu (John C. Baez) writes:
>Yes, here there seems to be a very nice interplay. It's one of the few
>things that keeps physicists talking to each other, the mathematical
>analogies between condensed matter physics and field theory. All sorts
>of tricks, like the ones you mention and also renormalization group
>methods, solitons and instantons, etc., show up in both subjects.
>Here's to the unity of nature!
I enjoy a bit of good interplay, now and again, myself. But do you
not think to a certain extent, that this is the result of the existence of
the most fashionable tool in our toolbox?
dale bass
--
C. R. Bass crb7q@virginia.edu
Department of Mechanical,
Aerospace and Nuclear Engineering
University of Virginia (804) 924-7926
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Nov7.034453.2080@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!ames!agate!stanford.edu!rutgers!concert!uvaarpa!murdoch!kelvin.seas.Virginia.EDU!crb7qReferences:
<3NOV199213063917@erich.triumf.ca> <BxA2GC.6yE@wsrcc.com> <1992Nov6.233219.15750@galois.mit.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!ames!agate!stanford.edu!rutgers!concert!uvaarpa!murdoch!kelvin.seas.Virginia.EDU!crb7q From: crb7q@kelvin.seas.Virginia.EDU (Cameron Randale Bass) Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Re: Solid-state doesn't use QED! (Was Re: Particle Research) Message-ID: <1992Nov7.034453.2080@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> Date: 7 Nov 92 03:44:53 GMT References: <3NOV199213063917@erich.triumf.ca> <BxA2GC.6yE@wsrcc.com> <1992Nov6.233219.15750@galois.mit.edu> Sender: usenet@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU Organization: University of Virginia Lines: 20