Article View: sci.physics
Article #4255Re: Simple observation about Quantum Kitty Cats
From: Jim Giles
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 23:01
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1992 23:01
20 lines
1373 bytes
1373 bytes
In article <1992Sep30.184855.1294@riacs.edu>, danforth@riacs.edu (Douglas G. Danforth) writes: |> In <1992Sep30.171247.784@newshost.lanl.gov> jlg@cochiti.lanl.gov |> (Jim Giles) writes: |> |> |> >Since no *action* at a distance is predicted by QM, there is no |> >problem. Only *correlation* at a distance is predicted. Such |> >correlation is quite commonplace in non-QM contexts using hidden |> >variables. The QM difference is that hidden variables have been |> >shown *not* to be involved. |> |> Detector efficiency is still a loophole that needs to be closed |> before hidden variables can be ruled out. Ok, but if you find you can't rule out hidden variables, then there's *really* nothing mysterious about QM. Correlation at a distance with hidden variables is commonplace - as I said. -- J. Giles
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Sep30.230105.11618@newshost.lanl.gov>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!uwm.edu!caen!hellgate.utah.edu!lanl!cochiti.lanl.gov!jlgReferences:
<1992Sep28.134825.29472@oracorp.com> <297@mtnmath.UUCP> <1992Sep30.184855.1294@riacs.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!uwm.edu!caen!hellgate.utah.edu!lanl!cochiti.lanl.gov!jlg From: jlg@cochiti.lanl.gov (Jim Giles) Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Re: Simple observation about Quantum Kitty Cats Message-ID: <1992Sep30.230105.11618@newshost.lanl.gov> Date: 30 Sep 92 23:01:05 GMT Article-I.D.: newshost.1992Sep30.230105.11618 References: <1992Sep28.134825.29472@oracorp.com> <297@mtnmath.UUCP> <1992Sep30.184855.1294@riacs.edu> Sender: news@newshost.lanl.gov Organization: Los Alamos National Laboratory Lines: 20