Article View: sci.physics
Article #443NASA Coverup
From: snarfy
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 1992 18:50
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 1992 18:50
72 lines
4934 bytes
4934 bytes
Well , it sounds like the willingness to cling to some kind of la-la
land belief that our government wouldn't lie to us about the moon
landings won't just melt in the face of straightforward ,elementary
mathematics ,and piles of circumstantial evidence. I guess I'll just have
to use even bigger piles of circumstantial evidence and MORE math. Here
goes:
In one sixth gravity , a 180 pound man would weigh a mere 30 pounds.
6/180 = 30
Writers had programmed the public to expect spectacular athletic feats
when astronauts explored the moon. In the November 1967 issue of Science
Digest an article entitled "How to walk on the Moon " predicted that men
would be able to make 14 foot slow motion leaps, perform backflips and
other gymnastics like professionals. and be able to easily move up
ladders and poles with their arms . An astronaut, , even in a cumbersome
suit could jump six times higher on the moon than on earth. Even though
the alleged weight of the spacesuits and backpacks was 185 pounds , the
total combined weight of a 185 pound astronaut and his suit would only be
62 pounds on the moon . This is still only one third of the astronaut's
weight. Therefore , they should have been able to jump far higher than
they could on the earth without any difficulty. The average person can
jump about 18 inches vertically without a run. On all of the video
footage shot by the astronauts while in the moonwalking mode , the
highest leaps performed by the most vigorous individuals, such as John
Young, never amounted to more than about 18 inches, while they were
THEORETICALLY CAPABLE OF SLOW BACKFLIPS!
Another thing. The practical design of a spacesuit would dictate that
economy of weight be a prime consideration, for the purposes of
maximizing payloads. The value of 185 pounds cannot be accounted for
unless you attribute most of this weight to some mysteriously heavy
equipment in the the backpack. While a Scuba diver's dual tanks weigh in
at about 80 pounds and are designed to aid the diver in sinking to the
bottom , presumably the astronaut's air containment system would be
significantly lighter. If we allow 40 pounds for air containment, 20
pounds for a hefty battery , and 40 or so pounds for lightweight heat
pumps and the like ,that leaves 85 pounds for the suit itself . This is
just not a believable figure judging from the general appearance of
flexibilty of the material.
If we merely assume that most of this alleged weight was taken up by the
backpack and helmet assemblies , placing the center of gravity high above
the astronaut's waist , the astronauts would have been a great deal more
"hunched over" to a near "V" position with helmet and backpack positioned
equally distant from a center line drawn straight up from the toes , just
to be able to maintain their balance. Yet a "lean" effect is just
slightly noticeable in a photograph of one of the astronauts saluting a
flag planted on the moon.In the photograph,the angle of lean is more
consistent with a backpack weighing about 45 to 65 pounds . I invite
interested science oriented individuals to research this conclusion for
themselves.
During Apollo 17 , astronauts Cernan and Scmitt began their first
assignment by deploying and loading the Rover . Cernan apparently became
quite excited and his Capsule Communicator , astronaut Parker warned him
that his metabolic rate was going up. That meant that he was using more
oxygen. Cernan replied that he never felt calmer in his life and
indicated to Parker that he would take it easy . He mentioned to Parker
that he thought that it was due to getting accustomed to handling himself
in "zero g".
Parker, an astronomer, then stated that he thought Cernan was working at
1/6 gravity. Cernan's reply was "Yes. You know where we are....whatever."
This remark suggests that Cernan wanted to avoid the discussion. Perhaps
Parker was not aware of the high gravity situation and asked an
embarrassing question.
Coming Next: Ten Embarrassing Questions about the Moon
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4586@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!destroyer!gumby!yale!yale.edu!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!netcomsv!cruzio!snarfyShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!gatech!destroyer!gumby!yale!yale.edu!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!netcomsv!cruzio!snarfy From: snarfy@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.space,alt.conspiracy Subject: NASA Coverup Keywords: Evidence gravity falsified Message-ID: <4586@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us> Date: Tue, 03 Nov 92 10:50:57 PST Sender: snarfy@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us Reply-To: snarfy@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us Lines: 77