🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <Bx8CGq.HsK@news.iastate.edu> fils@iastate.edu (Douglas R Fils) writes:
>
>	While reviewing my 300 level quantum bokk I came upon a
>section that hadn't impressed me as much as it does now.  It's
>in reference to possibility of doubly magic nuclei at Z=114
>and N=184 (Shell model) or perhaps more accurately, Z=110
>and N=184 (Collective model prediction) with decay on the order
>of 10^8 years via alpha or spontaneoius fission.
>
>	Has anyone got any good references or heard anything about
>this subject?

You bet.  After all, FSU is the home of the original experiments on 
primordial superheavy nuclei, experiments that appeared to have located 
such nuclei in halos that surround certain inclusions found in mica 
from places like Madagascar.  The halos are produced by damage in the 
mica produced by alpha decay of the stuff in the inclusion.  The extra 
large halos in some samples suggested a high decay energy and, indirectly, 
an origin in previously unknown superheavy nuclei.  One of the persons 
involved, Gentry, thought this was evidence for a young earth.  

Anyway, they did PIXE (proton induced X-ray emission) with a microbeam 
that allowed them to scan the inclusion, looking for K x-rays from a 
high Z nucleus.  They thought they saw some, ran some tests, fought 
with all kinds of leaks (two funding agencies were involved so there 
was a turf battle over who might get the credit for funding it), and 
published in PRL 37,11 (1976).  It turned out (PRL 37,629) that there 
was a previously unsuspected gamma ray that caused the peak they saw. 
What was left is insignificant.  Suspicions abound surrounding the 
fact that the test runs of that set of targets (they ran a test on 
every natural isotope) had been made by one of the proponents.  The 
FSU group is quite proud that they caught the mistake -- unfortunately, 
the pressure from Washington DC to publish kept them from doing another 
test that would have warned that something was wrong.  Science in the 
fast lane.... 

The big advance that came out of this was in the theory.  The Z they 
thought had been found was not in the region where some calculations 
had predicted.  It turns out (see PRL 37,558) that these predictions 
used the wrong spin-orbit force for heavy nuclei, but since all that 
work had been done within a small group talking only to each other, 
no one had noticed that they got increasingly more accurate answers 
with input that was not consistent with other data.  What else is 
new, right?  Same old story.... 

Up to then, most searches had been done by looking at radioactivity 
produced in the beam dump at the Bevalac or in other experiments done 
by splattering a real heavy projectile like Cf-251 into a real heavy 
target like U-238 and hoping they would get lucky.  They did not, 
mainly because the fused combination was so "hot" that it blew apart 
into lots of tiny pieces.  More recently, experiments pioneered in 
Germany used projectile-target combinations where fusion leaves the 
final nucleus with very little excitation energy.  They have seen 
nuclei up to Z=109 in this way.  Only time will tell if an island 
of stabilty will be found.  If it is, it will be a wonderful place 
to study many questions about the nature of the nuclear force and 
what happens in places like neutron stars. 

--
J. A. Carr                                    |  "The New Frontier of which I  
jac@gw.scri.fsu.edu                           |  speak is not a set of promises
Florida State University  B-186               |  -- it is a set of challenges."
Supercomputer Computations Research Institute |   John F. Kennedy (15 July 60)