🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Oct2.230447.25257@access.usask.ca>, choy@skorpio.usask.ca (I am a terminator.) writes...
>What do we know for closed form equations describing or modelling
>the activity experienced by subatomic particles? How about recursive
>equations or series? Do we tend to talk about collections of
>particles or can we talk about each individual particle as it
>interacts with other particles? Can we predict what happens at
>a particular point in space as time passes? I'm wondering about the
>extent of any generalization that has been done from experimental
>results. Is there a handbook of formulas available? in the works?
>Anyone interested in compiling one?
> 
>Henry Choy
>choy@cs.usask.ca

My goodness.  What a pile of questions!  It seems like you are asking
if particle physics exists as a theoretical science, to go along with 
the piles of data we have acquired over the years.  The answer, of course,
is yes.  Rather than try to answer each of your questions point by point,
I will recommend that you pick up any of the common undergraduate introductions 
to particle physics and do a little casual study.  One good book is 
Perkins.  I never can remember titles, only authors.  I think that it's
_Introduction to High Energy Physics_.  Good luck.

-Scott  
--------------------
Scott I. Chase			"The question seems to be of such a character
SICHASE@CSA2.LBL.GOV		that if I should come to life after my death
				and some mathematician were to tell me that it
				had been definitely settled, I think I would
				immediately drop dead again."      - Vandiver