Article View: sci.physics
Article #4560Re: Spin
From: Keith Ramsay
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 1992 01:37
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 1992 01:37
18 lines
1344 bytes
1344 bytes
In article <BvM2xp.En2@well.sf.ca.us> metares@well.sf.ca.us (Tom Van Flandern) writes: ... > The empirical part of this fact means that no gravitational >aberration has ever been detected, even though certain observations have >ten orders of magnitude more sensitivity than needed to detect any such >aberration which would exist if gravity propagated between masses in the >manner and at the speed of light. How was it determined what kind of "aberration" would exist if gravitation propagated at the speed of light? In particular, are you claiming anything which is known to be inconsistent with (a) the orbits are consistent with general relativity, and (b) gravity propagates at speed c in GR? If not, then please word the claim differently in the future. Keith Ramsay ramsay@unixg.ubc.ca
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Oct5.013734.29341@unixg.ubc.ca>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!wupost!gumby!destroyer!cs.ubc.ca!unixg.ubc.ca!ramsayReferences:
<1992Sep30.215109.3767@sjsumcs.sjsu.edu> <BvM2xp.En2@well.sf.ca.us>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.physics Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!wupost!gumby!destroyer!cs.ubc.ca!unixg.ubc.ca!ramsay From: ramsay@unixg.ubc.ca (Keith Ramsay) Subject: Re: Spin Message-ID: <1992Oct5.013734.29341@unixg.ubc.ca> Sender: news@unixg.ubc.ca (Usenet News Maintenance) Nntp-Posting-Host: unixg.ubc.ca Organization: University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada References: <1992Sep30.215109.3767@sjsumcs.sjsu.edu> <BvM2xp.En2@well.sf.ca.us> Date: Mon, 5 Oct 1992 01:37:34 GMT Lines: 18