🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <abian.721368793@pv343f.vincent.iastate.edu>, abian@iastate.edu (Alexander Abian) writes:
 > Mr. Watts,                          
 > 
 >    I tried to read your two  page posting. It is difficult for me 
 > to manage to catch your whole posting since (repeating your words)
 > the construction of your sentences are grammatically faulty.  If
 > you rewrite your posting (again repeating your words) in correct
 > English, I may  reconsider replying to it.

What kind of nonsense is this? I read Watts's article too, and it was
both more gramatically correct, and easier to understand than most other
articles. What kind of game are you playing? Are you paranoid? Or
maybe you are a simple program, ELIZA-like, just mirroring input?

And as for correct english, mr Watts appear to be from the United
Kingdom, while you appear to be from the United States, and
thereby don't speak or talk correct english.

 > (A1)     THE TENDENCY OF MAINTAINING THE STATUS QUO, REACTION TO PRO-
 >          VOCATION AND THE TENDENCY OF MAINTAINING AGAIN A STATUS QUO.

And that is still an ill formed sentence. The usual way to interpret
such a sentence is to expand the ',' as part of a multiple attribute,
like this:
THE TENDENCY OF MAINTAINING THE STATUS QUO, and the tendency of
maintaining REACTION TO PROVOCATION, AND THE TENDENCY OF MAINTAINING
AGAIN A STATUS QUO.

Since your postings continues to have nothing to do with science,
you should get away from this group.

Kim0

PS: Dette er en gramatialsk korrekt setning, som Abian ikke kan lese.