Article View: sci.physics
Article #4608Aye, I Agree...
From: Travis Stone
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 1992 15:20
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 1992 15:20
54 lines
2587 bytes
2587 bytes
To those of you who E_Mailed me about my Mattel post:
(1) You ain't telling me anything I don't already know
from direct experience; I work in the University's
Math Lab with the algebra and precalc-algebra students,
and the majority of these folks tell me the same thing
time after time: "I hated math in High School...I think
math is tough...I was never any good at math, especially
in High School...It just seems SO COMPLICATED..." Etc. etc.
(2) YOU know that it's *really* not that tough...I know it's
really not that tough...but YOU must realize that our
attitudes towards the subject are radically DIFFERENT
than those of the poor buggers who are just now being
exposed to symbolic math. I don't mean to sound elitist
or anything, but have you considered the nonzero
possibility that attitudes like ours might, I say, just
MIGHT be the exception, rather than the rule? If it
WEREN'T, then one would expect alot more people would
be devoting themselves to mathematics, no?....
To the folks at sci.physics: I apologize for not "sticking to
the subject", i.e., Physics; I would also like to ask the
mathematically well-versed out there for some help/advice:
Can any of you suggest a good beginner's-level text in
Perturbation Theory? I seek a book that has the following
requirements:
(i) Introductory Level--not too much on the theoretical side
(ii) Lots of worked examples
(iii) Lots of problems to work at the end of the chapter, and
MOST IMPORTANTLY: ANSWERS IN THE BACK OF THE BOOK!
The reason that I pose this conundrum to you, the friendly
folk of sci.physics, is that as Physics-oriented people,
you are much more likely to know some good applied-math
texts; asking the sci.math folks would most likely net me
a list of theoretical texts explaining the "why it works"
aspect, and not the "how to do it"---which is what I'm after.
Thanks in advance!
T.R. Stone
University of Nebraska-Omaha
Sometimes a bit too tongue-in-cheek for His own Good..
D
D
D
D
D
D
aspects, and not the "how to do it"
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<stone.718298401@cwis>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!usenet.coe.montana.edu!caen!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!news.unomaha.edu!cwis!stoneShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!usenet.coe.montana.edu!caen!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!news.unomaha.edu!cwis!stone From: stone@cwis.unomaha.edu (Travis Stone) Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Aye, I Agree... Keywords: Quite so, quite so.. Message-ID: <stone.718298401@cwis> Date: 5 Oct 92 15:20:01 GMT Article-I.D.: cwis.stone.718298401 Sender: news@news.unomaha.edu (UNO Network News Server) Organization: University of Nebraska at Omaha Lines: 54