🚀 go-pugleaf

In <1992Nov11.102739.10500@ugle.unit.no> kim@Lise.Unit.NO (Kim Gunnar St|vring \yhus) writes:

>Warning to new readers of Abians postings concerning his principle.

>If you post something about his principle, no matter how polite you
>formulate it, the usual thing for Abian is to either answer rudely and with
>no real content, or ignore you.

>It has been proved that his principle is informationless, unusable, and not
>science, but he still lingers on in this newsgroup.

>Abian feeds on replies. Please don't feed him.

>Kim0

     Dear Mr. Kim,                                         11-12-92

     I never insult people without being insulted first.
     You are telling people don't feed him, but you are feeding me
yourself. 
     My principle (A1) is the best scientific principle.  It describes
behavior of particles and people and everything in between.  In case you
have forgotten, it states:

(A1)   THE TENDENCY OF MAINTAINING THE STATUS QUO, REACTION TO PROVOCA-
       TION AND THE TENDENCY OF MAINTAINING AGAIN A STATUS QUO.

    (A1)  is scientifically verifiable  your actions, my actions, the
actions of Uranium, plutonium, etc., are all governed by (A1).

   Likewise, my (A2) is extremely  informative, revolutionary and will
change the aspect of Modern Physics and will be the central theme of
the 21-st century Physics.  In case you have forgotten, it states:

(A2)  TIME HAS INERTIA and some energy is irretrievably dissipated for
                 moving TIME forward.  Thus the Principle of Conser-
                 vation of Energy must be rejected.

With best wishes and regards,                Alexander ABIAN



-- 
   The tendency of maintaining the status-quo, Reaction to provocation and
                The tendency of maintaining again a status-quo.  
    TIME HAS INERTIA  and some energy is lost to move Time forward  
  E = mcc  (Einstein)    must be replaced by    E = m(0) exp(-At) (Abian)