🚀 go-pugleaf

abian@iastate.edu (Alexander Abian) writes:

>In <1992Nov11.102739.10500@ugle.unit.no> kim@Lise.Unit.NO (Kim Gunnar St|vring \yhus) writes:

>>Warning to new readers of Abians postings concerning his principle.

>>If you post something about his principle, no matter how polite you
>>formulate it, the usual thing for Abian is to either answer rudely and with
>>no real content, or ignore you.

>>It has been proved that his principle is informationless, unusable, and not
>>science, but he still lingers on in this newsgroup.

>>Abian feeds on replies. Please don't feed him.

>>Kim0

>     Dear Mr. Kim,                                         11-12-92

>     I never insult people without being insulted first.
>     You are telling people don't feed him, but you are feeding me
>yourself. 
>     My principle (A1) is the best scientific principle.  It describes
>behavior of particles and people and everything in between.  In case you
>have forgotten, it states:

>(A1)   THE TENDENCY OF MAINTAINING THE STATUS QUO, REACTION TO PROVOCA-
>       TION AND THE TENDENCY OF MAINTAINING AGAIN A STATUS QUO.

Is there anything new? You have just rewritten the so called Le Chateliet
Principle... (sorry but I'm not sur about he spelling).

>    (A1)  is scientifically verifiable  your actions, my actions, the
>actions of Uranium, plutonium, etc., are all governed by (A1).

I don't think so, have you ever met Liapunov instability?


>   Likewise, my (A2) is extremely  informative, revolutionary and will
>change the aspect of Modern Physics and will be the central theme of
>the 21-st century Physics.  In case you have forgotten, it states:

Let say this to people of next centuries...

>(A2)  TIME HAS INERTIA and some energy is irretrievably dissipated for
>                 moving TIME forward.  Thus the Principle of Conser-
>                 vation of Energy must be rejected.

May be the timescale of the energy loss is so big we are not able to
discover it, but I need some experimental evidence to belive in (A2) or
some good theoretical explanation...


>With best wishes and regards,                Alexander ABIAN

Bye
Franz

>-- 
>   The tendency of maintaining the status-quo, Reaction to provocation and
>                The tendency of maintaining again a status-quo.  
>    TIME HAS INERTIA  and some energy is lost to move Time forward  
>  E = mcc  (Einstein)    must be replaced by    E = m(0) exp(-At) (Abian)
-- 
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  Francesco  D. Di Tolla            |                                     |
|  Dip. di Fisica Univ. di Trento    | SISSA/ISAS via Beirut, 2-4          |
|  I-38050 Povo (TN)                 | I-34013 Trieste                     |