Article View: sci.physics
Article #4918Re: Sarfatti errata
From: John C. Baez
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 21:18
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 21:18
14 lines
1241 bytes
1241 bytes
In article <1dsscsINNlci@iskut.ucs.ubc.ca> ramsay@unixg.ubc.ca (Keith Ramsay) writes: >I am open to suggestions about this discussion with Sarfatti, as to >whether this is the best way to deal with him. What I want most is to >avoid anyone being convinced by mistaken arguments here. Sarfatti >regularly states conclusions based on his arguments as fact, and I >don't want anyone misled. On the other hand, it may be that I am >really addressing myself to an audience of just one, i.e., Sarfatti >himself. Your persistence has been admirable but clearly it will never equal Sarfatti's. So at some point you will have to say, "I give up, but what you are writing is wrong" - and perhaps occaisionally offer your transcripts of the argument to any newcomer netters who may be interested in Sarfatti's work.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Nov13.211822.9890@galois.mit.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!galois!riesz!jbaezReferences:
<1dsscsINNlci@iskut.ucs.ubc.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.physics Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!galois!riesz!jbaez From: jbaez@riesz.mit.edu (John C. Baez) Subject: Re: Sarfatti errata Message-ID: <1992Nov13.211822.9890@galois.mit.edu> Sender: news@galois.mit.edu Nntp-Posting-Host: riesz Organization: MIT Department of Mathematics, Cambridge, MA References: <1dsscsINNlci@iskut.ucs.ubc.ca> Date: Fri, 13 Nov 92 21:18:22 GMT Lines: 14