Article View: sci.physics
Article #4926Re: Baez to Ramsay
From: Jack Sarfatti
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 1992 02:58
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 1992 02:58
22 lines
1558 bytes
1558 bytes
John Baez you are abdicating your responsibility for intellectual honesty. Yes,I am persistent the way Bohr was persistent. I have answered every objection that Ramsay made. I thibnk our major point of disagreement is over whether |a,e,+> is orthogonal or parallel to |a,o,->. Ramsay saus orthogonal and I say parallel. I say paralle for physical reasons - they represent same state of polarization. Ramsay says orthogonal because he thinks falsely that unitarity requires it. No there is room for honest debate here. It is smug , arrogant, and foolish of you to think that the foundations of quantum mechanics, especially the informal language of how to properly connect abstract formalism to physical operations, is so pat and well understood. All the great masters warn us not to fall into the hubris that you so blatantly display - also some of the others. In any case I hope the inquisitors - the orthodox priests of the Grand Illusion that there even is "an orthodox" or "standard" quantum mechanics will not succeed in supressing freedom on thought. And I hope the others out there keep an independent frame of mind and not fall into line with the rest of the sheep of academe. Remember "What do you care what other people think?"
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<BxoqxH.66r@well.sf.ca.us>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!well!sarfattiShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.physics Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!well!sarfatti From: sarfatti@well.sf.ca.us (Jack Sarfatti) Subject: Re: Baez to Ramsay Message-ID: <BxoqxH.66r@well.sf.ca.us> Sender: news@well.sf.ca.us Organization: Whole Earth 'Lectronic Link Date: Sat, 14 Nov 1992 02:58:28 GMT Lines: 22