🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.physics
Article #4926

Re: Baez to Ramsay

#4926
From: Jack Sarfatti
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 1992 02:58
22 lines
1558 bytes
John Baez you are abdicating your responsibility for intellectual honesty.
Yes,I am persistent the way Bohr was persistent. I have answered every
objection that Ramsay made. I thibnk our major point of disagreement is
over whether |a,e,+> is orthogonal or parallel to |a,o,->. Ramsay saus
orthogonal and I say parallel. I say paralle for physical reasons - they
represent same state of polarization. Ramsay says orthogonal because he
thinks falsely that unitarity requires it.

No there is room for honest debate here. It is smug , arrogant, and foolish
of you to think that the foundations of quantum mechanics, especially the
informal language of how to properly connect abstract formalism to physical
operations, is so pat and well understood. All the great masters warn us
not to fall into the hubris that you so blatantly display - also some of
the others.

In any case I hope the inquisitors - the orthodox priests of the Grand
Illusion that there even is "an orthodox" or "standard" quantum mechanics
will not succeed in supressing freedom on thought. And I hope the others
out there keep an independent frame of mind and not fall into line with
the rest of the sheep of academe. Remember "What do you care what other
people think?"
Technical Details
Message-ID: <BxoqxH.66r@well.sf.ca.us>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!well!sarfatti

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!well!sarfatti
From: sarfatti@well.sf.ca.us (Jack Sarfatti)
Subject: Re: Baez to Ramsay
Message-ID: <BxoqxH.66r@well.sf.ca.us>
Sender: news@well.sf.ca.us
Organization: Whole Earth 'Lectronic Link
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 1992 02:58:28 GMT
Lines: 22