🚀 go-pugleaf

To the Readers of TIME HAS INERTIA

Att:  RIEMERS and Indra SINHA

        (A1) EXPLAINS PHYSICS from particle to Galaxies

 
What Galileo, Newton, Maxwell, Planck, Einstein and Schroedinger
failed to notice, deduce and conclude is that

    In accordance with (A1) and as (A1) predicts and explains

     THE SPACE ITSELF  AS ANY PARTICLE  TENDS TO MAINTAIN  ITS
     NEUTRALITY and reacts by trying to annihilate the concentration
     of particles at any place -  With weak and small particles
     it succeeds by decaying them explicitly under our eyes; with big 
     masses the decaying process  takes  TIME.  The  resulting
     energy is irretrievably dissipated to move TIME forward.

     This Tendency of maintaining the status quo is mutually provocative
     and reaction to these provocations is what gives rise to
     the dynamics of the Cosmos. The annihilated masses provide
     the energy to move TIME forward.


    The theories and equations of Newton, Maxwell, Einstein, Schroedinger  
    do not explain the dynamics of the Cosmos the way  (A1) explains in  
    the above. The  Newton, Maxwell, Einstein and Co equations are but  
    NURSERY RHYMES compared with my (A1).
    
     THE PERENNIAL STRUGGLE IS BETWEEN THE TENDENCY OF THE SPACE TO
     MAINTAIN ITS NEUTRALITY BY ANNIHILATING OR AT LEAST BY DILUTING
     THE CONCENTRATION OF PARTICLES on the one hand AND THE TENDENCY OF THE 
     PARTICLES FOR MAINTAINING THEIR STATUS QUO on the other hand.


     With love                           Alexander Abian

-- 
   The tendency of maintaining the status-quo, Reaction to provocation and
                The tendency of maintaining again a status-quo.  
    TIME HAS INERTIA  and some energy is lost to move Time forward  
  E = mcc  (Einstein)    must be replaced by    E = m(0) exp(-At) (Abian)