Article View: sci.physics
Article #4960Re: TEXAS ASTROPHYSICS MEETING at UCB
From: Matt Austern
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1992 23:34
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 1992 23:34
66 lines
4173 bytes
4173 bytes
In article <ofBHJTW00YUoI4vo94@andrew.cmu.edu> st0o+@andrew.cmu.edu (Steven Timm) writes: > Mr. Sarfatti suggested that the result was presented at the TEXAS meeting > (in Berkeley, CA) that the universe would not expand indefinitely. > > By this I assume he claims that results were presented that indicate > that Omega (density/critical density) is greater than or equal to 1. I certainly don't remember anybody at the conference making any claim of that nature; the speakers in all of the talks I went to adhered rather closely to the party line, i.e., that all experimental evidence suggests that omega is rather less than one, that for aesthetic and/or theoretical reasons it would nice if omega turned out to be exactly equal to one, and that there is no reason to think that omega is greater than one. There was one speaker, though, who presented a result that was, at least, reminiscent of what Mr. Sarfatti said; perhaps he is thinking of Alex Vilenkin's talk on quantum cosmology. Most of Dr. Vilenkin's talk was on very speculative subjects, but he spent some of the time on inflation. (Yes, I know---but that really was the least speculative part of the talk. Honest.) Specifically, he talked about the rather embarrassing (and rather well known) problem with inflation: it's very easy to find models in which inflation occurs, but it's very hard to find ones in which the inflation stops! What tends to happen is that when the universe cools down sufficiently, a phase transition occurs---but only in isolated bubbles. The bubbles expand, and more bubbles of the new phase keep forming, but the space between the bubbles grows faster than the phase transition can take place, and so most of the universe remains in the old (metastable) phase, and keeps inflating. (Think of the phase transition from liquid to gas; when you boil water, that phase transition starts in bubbles, and then eventually the bubbles grow and meet. Well, the problem with inflation is that the bubbles apparently can't grow fast enough so that they meet.) Well, as I said, that's a well-known problem, and an equally well known possibility for solving it is to just accept it: to say that most of the universe really does just stay in the old phase, and is still expanding, and will continue to expand forever. According to this view, we just happen to live in one of the bubbles of the lower-energy phase. What Dr. Vilenkin talked about was a possibility that he called "eternal inflation." This is a suggestion that, just as inflation will not have an end, so, also, it never had a beginning: no matter how far forward or backwards in time you extrapolate, you will just see inflation, with bubbles of the new phase continuing to form. And the result he presented, specifically, was that "eternal inflation" is impossible: there is nothing wrong with inflation continuing forever, but, he claimed, it had to begin somewhere. It can't have been going on forever. Unfortunately, I don't remember the reason he gave for thinking that eternal inflation doesn't work. I found the whole talk rather too speculative for my tastes---especially since, as I said, this part that I just summarized was the most real-world, experimentally verifiable part of the talk. -- Matthew Austern Just keep yelling until you attract a (510) 644-2618 crowd, then a constituency, a movement, a austern@lbl.bitnet faction, an army! If you don't have any matt@physics.berkeley.edu solutions, become a part of the problem!
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<MATT.92Dec20233442@physics2.berkeley.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!agate!mattReferences:
<ofBHJTW00YUoI4vo94@andrew.cmu.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!agate!matt From: matt@physics2.berkeley.edu (Matt Austern) Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Re: TEXAS ASTROPHYSICS MEETING at UCB Date: 20 Dec 92 23:34:42 Organization: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory (Theoretical Physics Group) Lines: 66 Message-ID: <MATT.92Dec20233442@physics2.berkeley.edu> References: <ofBHJTW00YUoI4vo94@andrew.cmu.edu> Reply-To: matt@physics.berkeley.edu NNTP-Posting-Host: physics2.berkeley.edu In-reply-to: st0o+@andrew.cmu.edu's message of 20 Dec 92 17:09:19 GMT