🚀 go-pugleaf

In <1992Nov15.221706.28787@noose.ecn.purdue.edu> muttiah@thistle.ecn.purdue.edu (Ranjan S Muttiah) writes:

>In article <abian.721860217@pv343f.vincent.iastate.edu> abian@iastate.edu (Alexander Abian) writes:
>>(A2)   TIME HAS INERTIA, i.e., TIME IS MATTER  and that some energy
>						         ^^^^
>How much ?  Some is a little bit vague.

      Dear Mr. Muttiah         (att: Mr. TALBOT)        11-15-92

   As I have mentioned in my article

           <abian.720308203@pv343f.vincent.iastste.edu>
 

the amount of lost energy for moving TIME forward can be determined  via
a COSMIC ENERGYMETER.  I have also mentioned that  the Technology will
devise COSMIC ENERGYMETERS which need not require to encompass the entire
Cosmos.  Please consult my abovementioned article
    Then you continue:

>>       is irretrievably spent by Cosmos to move TIME forward. Thus,
>>       in particular, the Principle of Conservation of Energy must be
>>       rejected. 

>For small scales (in laboratories) CoE seems to be doing fine.  For the
>whole cosmos, your guess is as good as anyone's; there's plenty of debate
>about whether the universe is closed or open.  

  Mr. Muttiah,
 
 I am very glad that you do not fanatically believe that THE CONSERVATION
OF ENERGY PRINCIPLE APPLIES TO THE ENTIRE COSMOS.  For some people the
CoE  is a  APOCALYPTIC COMMANDMENT -a religion a life-time commitment!!
 
 It annoys me that people demand: "Abian, prove that some energy of Cosmos
is irretrievable lost for moving TIME forward " 
 and they have the nerve not to DEMAND from themselves the proof that
"the Cosmos does not lose any energy" - it is quite hypocritical !!!

  Mr Muttiah, then you continue by saying:

>About, TIME.  If there were no observers, who is to measure it ?  It is 
>pretty much a bookkeeping device invented by humans.  What type of TIME 
>did you have in mind ? Anyway, according to the Hubble law space (and 
>time ?) is expanding ...
>moving forward if you will.

   My reply is that if there were no observers , who is to measure the 
gravity ? 
   I agree with you that any measuring is pretty much a bookkeeping
device invented by humans.   
  As far as "What type of TIME did I have in mind?" This is explained
in my abovementioned article  by:  
                  
                       t = (1/A) log (B/E(t))
     
   With best wishes and regards,
                                              Alexander ABIAN







-- 
   The tendency of maintaining the status-quo, Reaction to provocation and
                The tendency of maintaining again a status-quo.  
    TIME HAS INERTIA  and some energy is lost to move Time forward  
  E = mcc  (Einstein)    must be replaced by    E = m(0) exp(-At) (Abian)