Article View: sci.physics
Article #5034Re: Religion & Physics Don't Mix
From: Cameron Randale Bass
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 07:27
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 07:27
45 lines
2923 bytes
2923 bytes
In article <1992Nov16.025934.14280@reks.uia.ac.be> gustin@evs2.uia.ac.be (Emmanuel Gustin) writes:
>Okay, science can't tell us anything about religion; a God you can subject
>to scientific study is not a God but a part of nature. The other way
>around is possible; because if God knows everything, He could tell us
>something we don't know, and if he is all-powerfull, the He can show his
>powers, doing the impossible. And most religions tell us He did...
>However, then we COULD make a scientific study about His existence,
>implying that God is part of nature, and thus cannot act against nature's
>laws. So all this logic adds up to nothing. My hasty conclusion: whether
>you believe God exists or not, logic won't help you to convince anyone.
To make this much stronger, 'All-powerful' and 'all-knowing'
is a concept outside of science. One cannot determine such a
concept within science.
>More important: Science can't accept religion as a part of its structure -
>nor superstition of prejudice. But religion has to accept logic and
>science, and many religious people have no trouble with that - what the
>pope tried to show when he apologized for the Galilei trial. Theology is
>based on faith but is not a purely mystical affair. As G.K. Chesterton
>made father Brown say when caught fake priest: attacking Logic is bad
>theology. People can't (at least not forever) believe in something that is
>clearly not true. Thus mixing religion into science is *impossible*, but
>mixing science into religion is an *inevitability*.
Religion has to accept nothing. Do you honestly think that the
Jains base their belief in reincarnation on *logic*? There is no
logic that explains basic facts of existence that must be
assumed.
Also, 'clearly not true' is in the eye of the beholder.
>Yes, I know there are lots of people who refuse to mix some science in
>their religion - creationists and others. But don't blame religion for
>this; it's bad science AND bad theology. It is true that religion is
It is perfectly consistent theology. It is *not* science.
dale bass
--
C. R. Bass crb7q@virginia.edu
Department of Mechanical,
Aerospace and Nuclear Engineering
University of Virginia (804) 924-7926
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Nov16.072757.29064@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!uvaarpa!murdoch!kelvin.seas.Virginia.EDU!crb7qReferences:
<74353@hydra.gatech.EDU> <1992Nov16.025934.14280@reks.uia.ac.be>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.physics Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!uvaarpa!murdoch!kelvin.seas.Virginia.EDU!crb7q From: crb7q@kelvin.seas.Virginia.EDU (Cameron Randale Bass) Subject: Re: Religion & Physics Don't Mix Message-ID: <1992Nov16.072757.29064@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> Sender: usenet@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU Organization: University of Virginia References: <74353@hydra.gatech.EDU> <1992Nov16.025934.14280@reks.uia.ac.be> Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 07:27:57 GMT Lines: 45