Article View: sci.physics
Article #5051HV lines and cancer (again), was Re: History of AC vs DC Power >>THE TRUTH!<< *=*
From: rhatcher
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 04:30
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 04:30
45 lines
2823 bytes
2823 bytes
In article <FRANL.92Nov14153854@draco.centerline.com>, franl@centerline.com (Fran Litterio) writes: |> quest@iowegia.uucp (Steve J. Quest) writes: |> |>|> steve@pepe.aero.org (Steve Sedlacek) writes: |>|> |>|> |> A new Swedish study apparently confirms a moderate |>|> |> correlation between living near high-power transmission lines and cancers. |> |>|> It is also a known fact that there is a high rate of |>|> cancer among uneducated and poor people. |> |> Fine so far... |> |>|> The reason being, they |>|> simply do not have proper hygiene, sanitation, or eating habits. |> |> Whoa!!! Strike hygiene from that list. Unless by "do not have proper |> hygiene" you mean "fail to wash hazardous/radioactive waste off they |> hands after contact", dirt on your skin won't give you cancer. |> franl@centerline.com || Fran Litterio, CenterLine Software R&D Dirt might not, but defoliants mixed in with the dirt might. Why would there be defoliants you ask? Utility companies need to keep the vegitation growth under control around those power lines. You've no doubt seen swaths of "clear cut" through forests and fields where power lines are strung. And how do you think they keep the vegitation down? Thus one reasonable explaination I've seen it that high-power transmission lines ARE associated with hazardous waste, it just doesn't happen to be E&M radiation, but high concentrations of weed inhibitors. This is probably not the sole cause, but mixed with those other negative factors associated with being poor it seems reasonable to assume one would see a statistical increase in poor health (including cancers). I'm intruiged by you're inclusion of radioactive wastes as a possibility. Surely you're not claiming that high-tension lines cause radioactivity? Or were you hinting that poor neighborhoods and power tension lines are generally located in areas with higher than average radioactive backgrounds? -robert Robert W. Hatcher | 256D Physics-Astronomy | hatcher@msupa (Bitnet) Software Tzar, Hunchback | Michigan State University | msuhep::hatcher (HEPnet) (517) 353-3008,-5180 | East Lansing, MI 48824 | hatcher@msupa.pa.msu.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Nov16.103041.1@fnala.fnal.gov>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!uwm.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!mp.cs.niu.edu!fnnews.fnal.gov!fnal.fnal.gov!rhatcherReferences:
<1992Nov11.154425.8399@speedy.aero.org> <1RJ6TB4w165w@iowegia.uucp> <FRANL.92Nov14153854@draco.centerline.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!uwm.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!mp.cs.niu.edu!fnnews.fnal.gov!fnal.fnal.gov!rhatcher From: rhatcher@fnala.fnal.gov Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: HV lines and cancer (again), was Re: History of AC vs DC Power >>THE TRUTH!<< *=* Message-ID: <1992Nov16.103041.1@fnala.fnal.gov> Date: 16 Nov 92 04:30:41 GMT Article-I.D.: fnala.1992Nov16.103041.1 References: <1992Nov11.154425.8399@speedy.aero.org> <1RJ6TB4w165w@iowegia.uucp> <FRANL.92Nov14153854@draco.centerline.com> Organization: Fermi National Accelerator Lab Lines: 45 NNTP-Posting-Host: fnala.fnal.gov