🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Dec11.200831.20413@cid.aes.doe.CA> ynecgan@cid.aes.doe.CA (Greg Neill) writes:
>In article <abian.724093986@pv343f.vincent.iastate.edu> abian@iastate.edu (Alexander Abian) writes:
>>    In accordance with (A1) and as (A1) predicts and explains
>>
>>     THE SPACE ITSELF  AS ANY PARTICLE  TENDS TO MAINTAIN  ITS
>>     NEUTRALITY and reacts by trying to annihilate the concentration
>>     of particles at any place -  With weak and small particles
>>     it succeeds by decaying them explicitly under our eyes; with big 
>>     masses the decaying process  takes  TIME.  The  resulting
>>     energy is irretrievably dissipated to move TIME forward.
>
>
>Is this your description for the mechanism of radioactivity?

It probably is. However, there is the small snag that the radioactive
decay of matter yeilds energy in proportion to the loss of mass, and
we *know* where this energy goes - we can measure the heat/light
emitted by the sun, for example. If we can trace the destination of
this energy, then it can't be being taken away somewhere to move time
forward.

--Clive.