Article View: sci.physics
Article #525NASA Coverup
From: snarfy
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 1992 01:27
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 1992 01:27
27 lines
1514 bytes
1514 bytes
>Snarfy Babbage, Are you making fun of my computer program ,comparing it to something Charles Babbage would concoct? Well, you're probably right . That invalidates nothing , however. > thou scourge of organ-grinders, Alright - the metaphor eludes me here . "Organ grinders?" > My point in case you didn't get it was that the earth is just as good at > ringing as the moon. You wondered whether Luna Bella might be hollow or > an artifact. My answer was that this is no more or less of a possibility > than for Terra Bella. You just need more evidence for the theory I put forward attempting to explain my Neutral point result . I understand . Coming up. Meanwhile, sir, I um, was wondering if you ,maybe, took a look at my article and perhaps , well, perhaps had an explanation for the conflict in the ,the DATA sir ..... about the Neutral Point.....Remember? Vaughan (please tell us you weren't being serious) Pratt Snar (was never more serious in my life, but I suppose that isn't saying much) fy
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4587@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!decwrl!csus.edu!netcom.com!netcomsv!cruzio!snarfyShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!decwrl!csus.edu!netcom.com!netcomsv!cruzio!snarfy From: snarfy@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: NASA Coverup Keywords: unar Neutral Point Lunar Neutral Point Calculation Message-ID: <4587@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us> Date: Tue, 03 Nov 92 17:27:06 PST Sender: snarfy@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us Reply-To: snarfy@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us Lines: 27