🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.physics
Article #5658

Re: Another antigravity device

#5658
From: Matt Austern
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 22:18
16 lines
1463 bytes
In article <1992Dec15.013620.24161@galois.mit.edu> jbaez@riesz.mit.edu (John C. Baez) writes:

> Now, I *know* that this material would have to be insanely rigid for
> this effect to be noticeable at all -- far more rigid than any actual
> stuff.  However, we're talking questions of principle here.  Is there
> any reason *in principle* why a sufficiently rigid material wouldn't
> levitate to get out of the earth's gravitational field - that's what I'm
> asking.  

Probably.  I'll bet you could prove that any material which really was
so rigid would also wind up being so dense that it couldn't levitate.
--
Matthew Austern                   Just keep yelling until you attract a
(510) 644-2618                    crowd, then a constituency, a movement, a
austern@lbl.bitnet                faction, an army!  If you don't have any
matt@physics.berkeley.edu         solutions, become a part of the problem!
Technical Details
Message-ID: <MATT.92Dec14221843@physics.berkeley.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!agate!matt
References: <1992Dec15.013620.24161@galois.mit.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!agate!matt
From: matt@physics.berkeley.edu (Matt Austern)
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Subject: Re: Another antigravity device
Date: 14 Dec 92 22:18:43
Organization: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory (Theoretical Physics Group)
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <MATT.92Dec14221843@physics.berkeley.edu>
References: <1992Dec15.013620.24161@galois.mit.edu>
Reply-To: matt@physics.berkeley.edu
NNTP-Posting-Host: physics.berkeley.edu
In-reply-to: jbaez@riesz.mit.edu's message of Tue, 15 Dec 92 01:36:20 GMT