Article View: sci.physics
Article #5658Re: Another antigravity device
From: Matt Austern
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 22:18
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 22:18
16 lines
1463 bytes
1463 bytes
In article <1992Dec15.013620.24161@galois.mit.edu> jbaez@riesz.mit.edu (John C. Baez) writes: > Now, I *know* that this material would have to be insanely rigid for > this effect to be noticeable at all -- far more rigid than any actual > stuff. However, we're talking questions of principle here. Is there > any reason *in principle* why a sufficiently rigid material wouldn't > levitate to get out of the earth's gravitational field - that's what I'm > asking. Probably. I'll bet you could prove that any material which really was so rigid would also wind up being so dense that it couldn't levitate. -- Matthew Austern Just keep yelling until you attract a (510) 644-2618 crowd, then a constituency, a movement, a austern@lbl.bitnet faction, an army! If you don't have any matt@physics.berkeley.edu solutions, become a part of the problem!
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<MATT.92Dec14221843@physics.berkeley.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!agate!mattReferences:
<1992Dec15.013620.24161@galois.mit.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!agate!matt From: matt@physics.berkeley.edu (Matt Austern) Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Re: Another antigravity device Date: 14 Dec 92 22:18:43 Organization: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory (Theoretical Physics Group) Lines: 16 Message-ID: <MATT.92Dec14221843@physics.berkeley.edu> References: <1992Dec15.013620.24161@galois.mit.edu> Reply-To: matt@physics.berkeley.edu NNTP-Posting-Host: physics.berkeley.edu In-reply-to: jbaez@riesz.mit.edu's message of Tue, 15 Dec 92 01:36:20 GMT