Article View: sci.physics
Article #5689Kaluza-Klein theories (Was TIME HAS INERTIA ABIAN replies to INDRA
From: Steve Carlip
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 20:03
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 20:03
39 lines
2658 bytes
2658 bytes
In article <1992Nov17.023054.3771@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu> corleyj@helium.gas.uug.arizona.edu (Jason D Corley ) writes: >[...] >However, with the >extra dimensions being proposed in superstring theory gaining >more and more acceptance, perhaps a review of Kaluza and Klein >and their ideas might be in the works! > This is almost exactly what has happened, though historically in the reverse order --- the revival of Kaluza-Klein theories in the 1980's was one of the main reasons that the extra dimensions of string theory were considered acceptable a few years later. One can actually do a great deal with Kaluza-Klein theories; by letting spacetime have more than one "extra" dimension, one can naturally incorporate non-Abelian gauge theories (strong and weak interactions) into general relativity. There was a great deal of work on this topic a few years ago --- see, for instance, _Modern Kaluza-Klein Theories_, edited by Appelquist, Chodos, and Freund (Addison-Wesley, 1987). The work has slowed down, for two basic reasons: 1. General relativity in four or more spacetime dimensions is not renormalizable, and we don't know how to quantize the theory. The successes of electrodynamics, electroweak theory, and quantum chromodynamics are all successes as _quantum_ theories; a classical unification is not nearly enough. 2. As classical models, Kaluza-Klein theories have too much flexibility to be satisfying. By appropriately choosing the geometry of the extra dimensions, you can get just about any gauge theory you want; there is nothing that picks out the particular interactions we see in the real world. The early hope in string theory was that consistency requirements would pick out a unique model, which would look like a Kaluza-Klein model at large distances, but with a unique, determined "internal geometry." It is now clear that this will not happen classically, but it is still an open question whether quantum effects will determine a unique string ground state. Steve Carlip carlip@dirac.ucdavis.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<19407@ucdavis.ucdavis.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!wupost!csus.edu!ucdavis!landau.ucdavis.edu!carlipReferences:
<1992Nov15.203056.14720@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu> <1992Nov16.230803.10096@galois.mit.edu> <1992Nov17.023054.3771@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!wupost!csus.edu!ucdavis!landau.ucdavis.edu!carlip From: carlip@landau.ucdavis.edu (Steve Carlip) Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Kaluza-Klein theories (Was TIME HAS INERTIA ABIAN replies to INDRA Keywords: Kaluza-Klein theories Message-ID: <19407@ucdavis.ucdavis.edu> Date: 19 Nov 92 20:03:59 GMT References: <1992Nov15.203056.14720@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu> <1992Nov16.230803.10096@galois.mit.edu> <1992Nov17.023054.3771@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu> Sender: usenet@ucdavis.ucdavis.edu Organization: Physics, UC Davis Lines: 40