🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.physics
Article #5818

Re: Chaitin's Omega and QM (was: Bayes' theorem and QM)

#5818
From: Timothy Murphy
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 02:59
55 lines
2342 bytes
jbaez@riesz.mit.edu (John C. Baez) writes:

>I salute Michael Weiss' post introducing people to the literature on 
>the number Omega, algorithmic information theory, algorithmic
>randomness theory etc..  This stuff is seriously cool and should be
>known by all those who love beautiful ideas.  Here is a nice
>bibliography of stuff along these lines that was passed on to me by Dave
>DeMers.  Unfortunately is doesn't have a reference to Martin-Loef, who
>(along with Kolmogorov, Solomonoff, Chaitin and others) deserves a lot
>of credit.  

Thank you very much for your bibliography,
which I know I shall find very useful.

It seems to me that the central concept of Kolmogorov/Chaitin theory
is _entropy_.
As I see it,
there have been 4 phases in the historical development of this concept --
or perhaps one should say that the same term has been applied
to 4 related concepts:

1. Thermodynamics
   Increase of entropy (S) as the measure of irreversibility.

2. Statistical mechanics
   S = -\sum p\log p

3. Shannon's information theory
   Entropy as a measure of information.

4. Chatin/Kolmogorov algorithmic information theory
   Entropy in the language of Turing machines.

But does entropy in the 4th sense
completely dispace Shannon's definition?
Can everything in Shannon theory
be expressed in algorithmic terms?

Equally, one might have asked if statistical mechanics
could be explained in terms of information?
Are the 2 kinds of entropy really the same?
Or is this simply to confuse 2 quantities
because they are defined by similar formulae?

I'd be interested to know the world's views on this!





-- 
Timothy Murphy  
e-mail: tim@maths.tcd.ie
tel: +353-1-2842366
s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1992Dec16.025906.21295@maths.tcd.ie>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!pipex!bnr.co.uk!uknet!ieunet!tcdcs!maths.tcd.ie!tim
References: <1gh518INN9eo@chnews.intel.com> <SRCTRAN.92Dec14122532@world.std.com> <COLUMBUS.92Dec14142145@strident.think.com> <1992Dec14.223229.22348@galois.mit.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!pipex!bnr.co.uk!uknet!ieunet!tcdcs!maths.tcd.ie!tim
From: tim@maths.tcd.ie (Timothy Murphy)
Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.math
Subject: Re: Chaitin's Omega and QM (was: Bayes' theorem and QM)
Message-ID: <1992Dec16.025906.21295@maths.tcd.ie>
Date: 16 Dec 92 02:59:06 GMT
References: <1gh518INN9eo@chnews.intel.com> <SRCTRAN.92Dec14122532@world.std.com> <COLUMBUS.92Dec14142145@strident.think.com> <1992Dec14.223229.22348@galois.mit.edu>
Organization: Dept. of Maths, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
Lines: 55