Article View: sci.physics
Article #604Re: Super Conducting Supercollider
From: John Byrd
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 1992 18:08
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 1992 18:08
35 lines
2461 bytes
2461 bytes
In article <1992Aug2.010657.29594@utagraph.uta.edu> sawyer@utahep.uta.edu (Lee Sawyer) writes: >In article <4605@dove.nist.gov>, gilligan@bldrdoc.gov (Jonathan Gilligan 3034973861) writes... >>In article <MATT.92Jul31102346@physics.berkeley.edu> matt@physics.berkeley.edu writes: >>>(Particle physicists are almost unanimous in supporting the >>>construction of the SSC; the opinions of scientists in other fields >>>are more diverse.) >> >>I'm not sure they all feel that way now that they know that the >>birth of the SSC will be the death of lepton machines and the >>contraception of the Bfactory. > > No no no you don't get it, Jon it means no Bfactory in the US. That is >not the same as saying "no Bfactory. Period." There are plans to locate a >Bfactory in Europe, possibly in Spain, although this is jepordised by the LHC. >The game plan seems clear, at least to me : Large hadron collider in the US, >500 TeV e+e machine at DESY, a TeV e+e later in Japan (with joint devel >opment work done at SLAC), a phi factory in Italy, a Bfactory in Spain. >With EVERYBODY ponying up for construction costs... Spanish scientists are proposing a tau-charm factory in Spain, not a B factory. The only serious proposals for a B factory in Europe that I know of are the PSI proposal in Switzerland which was not approved by the Swiss govt. (almost 2 years ago!) and another proposal to locate a B factory in the CERN SPS tunnel. The CERN effort has a low priority at CERN. DESY had some plans for a B factory but their plates are quite full right now with HERA. The most promising proposal for a B factory outside of the US is in Japan. I agree that the LHC (and LEP) is jeopardizing many projects in Europe. The B factory efforts in the US are far from dead. I believe that a BF in this country represents the best hope to maintain the US HEP program in pre-SSC-LHC-JLC era. It is far from clear how the fate of the SSC will affect the BF. Wait and see... -John Byrd
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<25166@dog.ee.lbl.gov>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!dog.ee.lbl.gov!usenetReferences:
<5568@lhdsy1.lahabra.chevron.com> <1992Aug2.010657.29594@utagraph.uta.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!dog.ee.lbl.gov!usenet From: John Byrd Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Re: Super Conducting Supercollider Date: 3 Aug 1992 18:08:25 GMT Organization: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Lines: 35 Distribution: world Message-ID: <25166@dog.ee.lbl.gov> References: <5568@lhdsy1.lahabra.chevron.com> <1992Aug2.010657.29594@utagraph.uta.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: 128.3.253.168