Article View: sci.physics
Article #621Re: Hubble constant?
From: Benjamin Weiner
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 1992 22:31
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 1992 22:31
21 lines
1378 bytes
1378 bytes
gt3716a@prism.gatech.EDU (Josh Freeman) writes: >On a side note, how is red shift calculated? It's not calculated. It's measured. Sorry - what one does is take a spectrum of the galaxy and then match the positions (in wavelength) of the observed spectral lines to a reference spectrum, and see what the shift is. Then you get the redshift, z = (lambda - lambda_0) / lambda_0. In the non-relativistic case v = z*c. (In my last post on this I wasn't clear; special relativity comes into this equation, however the linear redshift-distance law is good up to high z. Sorry. Once upon a time people were going to measure the deviation from linearity to get q_0 ....) Measuring redshifts is the less fallible part of the Hubble Law; measuring distances is a whole lot harder. This is the source of most of the Hubble constant wars. The above should be taken with a grain of salt as I have never actually measured a redshift in that fashion.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Aug.3.18.31.08.1992.24709@ruhets.rutgers.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!rutgers!dziuxsolim.rutgers.edu!ruhets.rutgers.edu!bweinerReferences:
<1468500004@igc.org> <64957@hydra.gatech.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!rutgers!dziuxsolim.rutgers.edu!ruhets.rutgers.edu!bweiner From: bweiner@ruhets.rutgers.edu (Benjamin Weiner) Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Re: Hubble constant? Message-ID: <Aug.3.18.31.08.1992.24709@ruhets.rutgers.edu> Date: 3 Aug 92 22:31:08 GMT References: <1468500004@igc.org> <64957@hydra.gatech.EDU> Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J. Lines: 21