🚀 go-pugleaf

The prediction for FTL and BIT communication on the spin-spin
quantum connection , for the gedanken device described in #1,
is that the difference in count rates at the receiver will
equal the sine of twice the misalignment between the transmitter
and receiver calcite rhombs (make it fixed at 45 degrees) times
the cosine of the variable transmitter interferometer translational
phase (phi(T)) encoding the message plus mirror reflection phase
shift mulitplied by cosine of half-silvered mirror beam recombiner
phase shift which is 1 for 180 degree phase shift. The net result
is that the difference in receiver counts is proportional to the
cosine of the transmitter interferometer phase shift.

In the experiments done so far the transmitter photon is not
allowed to interfere with itself in the manner indicated in #1
(half wave plate in one iterferometer path, phase plate in other)
and the receiver light is always unpolarized (equal counting rates).
Because of the structure of the pair state (HH + VV)/sqrt2
->V(H + e^iphiV)/sqrt2 since H ->V at transmitter, the first order
coherence at the transmitter disappears because of the orthogonality
of H and V for the twin receiver photon now in its own coherent
statr (H + e^iphiV)/sqrt2 rather than the initial entangled state.
Because of the distributive law of algebra, the local transmitter
phase modulation variable phi has, in effect, "teleported" to
the receiver. Thus, first order coherence lost at the transmitter
detection region in space-time is regained as coherent polarization
at the receiver detection region.

This is a non-metrical quantum phase communication effect independent
of the space-time interval between the transmitter detection event T
and the receiver detection event R. In particular, in a delayed
choice mode T is time-like after R (frame invariant BIT COM) in
which the classical time sequence between cause and effect is
reversed. Kip Thorne et-al has shown how this can be done in a
"globally self-consistent" manner (see my Physics Essays, Vol 4
No. 3, Spet 91 Univ. Toronto Press for details and ref.).

One can use Cramer's "transactional" picture or Costa de Beauregard's
"Feynman zig zag" to understand this. The information about setting
of calcite in future at T is lightlike propagated by advanced
wave back to pair emission event S in past. The polarization basis
for receiver photon is super-determined from future T. The receiver
photon carries this information forward in time where it is
analysed by receiver calcite set at incompatible orientation to
transmitter calcite. All that matters is orientations of calcites
at times of local detections of each photon in same pair. There
is no direct propagation of energy or information directly
between events T and R only via S. This model presupposes the
de-Broglie "double solution" and extended to multiparticle states
by Bohm and Vigier with the nonlocal "quantum potential".

email: sarfatti@well.sf.ca.us or (415) 788 4510 or fax (415)397 0250
or mail POB 26548 San Frncisco CA 94126