Article View: sci.physics
Article #671Re: Hubble constant?
From: Emory F. Bunn
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 1992 20:56
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 1992 20:56
51 lines
3221 bytes
3221 bytes
In article <1992Aug4.183334.20946@galois.mit.edu> jbaez@riesz.mit.edu (John C. Baez) writes: >In article <92216.155158DOCTORJ@SLACVM.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU> DOCTORJ@SLACVM.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU (Jon J Thaler) writes: >>jbaez@riesz.mit.edu (John C. Baez) says: > >>If one is clever, one notices that the dimensionality of the Hubble >>constant is inverse time. In fact, in a big bang cosmology it tells you >>to within a numerical factor the age of the universe. > >Thanks. I wasn't being clever!!! So the Hubble constant times the age >of the universe is a bit more "constant" (with time) than Hubble's >constant, but deceleration means even it's not constant. Let's call it >the Hubble variable, how about. > In a couple of special cases, the quantity H_0 times t_0 (where H_0 is the Hubble parameter and t_0 is the age of the Universe) is constant. There is a so-called "critical density" of the Universe, which is defined to be the mass density the Universe would have to have in order that the gravitational attraction be strong enough to stop the expansion. If the density of the Universe is much less than this critical density, then H_0 t_0 = 1. (This is just the case of no deceleration.) If the density of the Universe exactly equals the critical density, then H_0 t_0 = 2/3. In all other cases you're right that this quantity is not constant. Note that the quantity H_0 t_0 measures something very different from H_0. H_0 is the expansion rate of the Universe, whereas H_0 t_0 is largely independent of that rate. (In the special cases above, it is completely independent of it.) By the way, the notation for all of these quantities does have some logic to it, which I haven't really been following. The subscript 0 generally refers to the present time, so that the statement "H_0 t_0 is constant in time" really should just be "Ht is constant in time." The symbol H refers to the Hubble parameter as a function of time, while H_0 refers to its present value. One more thing: The ratio of the actual density of the Universe to the critical density is denoted by a capital Omega. The symbol Omega_0 refers to its value at the present time. So the two special cases I described are Omega << 1 and Omega = 1. The quantity Omega is an extremely useful number to know about the Universe, so you'll see it mentioned a lot if you read about cosmology. There are theoretical reasons for suspecting that Omega=1, but direct measurements of the density (which is a tricky thing to do) imply that Omega is about 0.1 or 0.2. That's why people talk about the existence of large amounts of "dark matter," to bring up the density to the critical density. -Ted (ted@physics.berkeley.edu)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<15mqt8INNlp@agate.berkeley.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!mips!sdd.hp.com!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!ames!agate!physics2!tedReferences:
<92216.155158DOCTORJ@SLACVM.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU> <1992Aug4.183334.20946@galois.mit.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!mips!sdd.hp.com!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!ames!agate!physics2!ted From: ted@physics2 (Emory F. Bunn) Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Re: Hubble constant? Message-ID: <15mqt8INNlp@agate.berkeley.edu> Date: 4 Aug 92 20:56:08 GMT References: <92216.155158DOCTORJ@SLACVM.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU> <1992Aug4.183334.20946@galois.mit.edu> Organization: /etc/organization Lines: 51 NNTP-Posting-Host: physics2.berkeley.edu