Article View: sci.physics
Article #678Re: Fusion reactor disasters --- impossible
From: John F. Woods
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 1992 16:47
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 1992 16:47
20 lines
1192 bytes
1192 bytes
franl@centerline.com (Fran Litterio) writes: >Isn't liquid lithium forseen as the medium used to absorbe the >neutrons speeding away from the fusion reaction? Yes. >Over time the >lithium becomes radioactive and needs to be replaced. Being a liquid >would actually make it harder to manage the storage of waste over many >decades *Liquid* lithium is a very hot molten metal. *Cold* lithium is a fairly reactive *solid* metal. Easy to store. (Of course, you'd probably want to react it to turn it into a non-reactive ceramic or glass for even easier storage). Note that lithium is used to absorb neutrons because that turns it into helium and tritium (instant fuel). The bulk lithium might well become radioactive from picking up bits of induced-radioactive material from pipe walls, etc.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<11215@ksr.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!world!ksr!jfwReferences:
<1992Mar31.171703.20622@newstand.syr.edu> <69672@ut-emx.uucp> <FRANL.92Apr3132432@draco.centerline.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!world!ksr!jfw From: jfw@ksr.com (John F. Woods) Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Re: Fusion reactor disasters --- impossible Message-ID: <11215@ksr.com> Date: 6 Apr 92 12:47:16 EDT References: <1992Mar31.171703.20622@newstand.syr.edu> <69672@ut-emx.uucp> <FRANL.92Apr3132432@draco.centerline.com> Sender: news@ksr.com Distribution: na Lines: 20