Article View: sci.physics
Article #708Re: SSC magnets - how?
From: Jon J Thaler
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 1992 18:25
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 1992 18:25
32 lines
1541 bytes
1541 bytes
In article <8400007@trsvax>, pauls@trsvax.tandy.com says: > AnotherSSC question: People at FNAL and SSC can answer better, but here's some of the answer. > 1) How many magnets are used? About 10,000 dipole magnets. I think there are also about 5000 others (quadrupoles, etc). > 2) In relative terms, how do they compare to other magnets in use today? I *think* that they only extend previous magnet technology in their size. The big issue in SSC magnet design has been field uniformity, but I don't really know the present status. > 3) What is MBTF of a magnet today (FermiLab)? Don't know. I think about 1/month (FNAL has 1000 superconducting magnets). > 4) How many 'up days' (up hours??) does the average collider have today? The rule of thumb is to assume 30% operating efficiency. This is supposed to accounts for all data loss, whether the accelerator's or experimenter's fault. I don't know what recent FNAL experience has been, but at CERN (LEP) it seems to work OK. > 5) If a SSC magnet goes fubar, is the whole thing down? If a ring magnet goes down, the accelerator is down for the few hours it takes to replace it.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<92098.102507DOCTORJ@SLACVM.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!unixhub!slacvm!doctorjShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!unixhub!slacvm!doctorj From: DOCTORJ@SLACVM.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU (Jon J Thaler) Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Re: SSC magnets - how? Message-ID: <92098.102507DOCTORJ@SLACVM.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU> Date: 7 Apr 92 18:25:07 GMT Organization: Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Lines: 32